Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Howard Darwen
    Guest

    Confusion about squeezebox and formats

    I know you didn't ask me, but I use the guess tags settings to extract tag
    info from the folder / filename structure. This can cause some problems
    (e.g. I just ran over the max. windows filepath length with 4 files because
    of all the tag info ... oooops). I was trying to stick to wavs because I
    didn't see the point of all the extra encoding to save about 35% of disc
    space (you can get a 500GB Lacie external disc for about ?300). Also, when I
    rip a CD I save an EAC CUE sheet so that I can burn the CD again if I ever
    need to - and that only works with wavs.

    I also seem to recall that slim supports CUE sheets (but not the proprietary
    EAC one), which would be another way of getting at least some of the
    metadata.

    Having said all that, I am considering moving to FLAC ...

    thx.

    H.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
    [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com]On Behalf Of Jeffrey
    Gordon
    Sent: 07 September 2004 21:32
    To: Slim Devices Discussion
    Subject: [slim] Confusion about squeezebox and formats


    Your collection is in WAV format? How do you tag your files? WAV does
    not support any type of tagging? Any reason why you choose WAV over say
    a lossless encoder?

    Mike Olson wrote:

    > Jason Holtzapple <jasonholtzapple@...> writes:
    >
    >
    >>Mike Olson wrote:
    >>
    >>>I'm a new user (SB on it's way). There's a thread over at audio asylum

    >
    > stating
    >
    >>>that the squeezebox compress ALL formats to MP3 for playback. Is this

    >
    > true?
    >
    >>>If so, what is the advantage of using uncompressed or lossless formats?

    >>
    >>Not true - they are probably thinking of the earlier SLIMP3 model, not the

    >
    > Squeezebox.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Thanks everyone for the info. It looks like someone has already corrected

    the
    > mis-information on AudioAsylum. Since my CD collection is already ripped

    to
    > WAV, I can breath a sigh of relief and anxiously await the SB arrival.
    >
    >
    >

  2. #2
    NOT a Slim Devices Employee kdf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    9,493

    Confusion about squeezebox and formats

    Slimserver doess support ID3 tags and RIFF INFO tags in WAV files. I'm clueless
    as to how you actually GET those tags in there, but if they are there, the
    server can read them
    -kdf

    Quoting Howard Darwen <hdarwen (AT) btinternet (DOT) com>:

    > I know you didn't ask me, but I use the guess tags settings to extract tag
    > info from the folder / filename structure. This can cause some problems
    > (e.g. I just ran over the max. windows filepath length with 4 files because
    > of all the tag info ... oooops). I was trying to stick to wavs because I
    > didn't see the point of all the extra encoding to save about 35% of disc
    > space (you can get a 500GB Lacie external disc for about ?300). Also, when I
    > rip a CD I save an EAC CUE sheet so that I can burn the CD again if I ever
    > need to - and that only works with wavs.
    >
    > I also seem to recall that slim supports CUE sheets (but not the proprietary
    > EAC one), which would be another way of getting at least some of the
    > metadata.
    >
    > Having said all that, I am considering moving to FLAC ...
    >
    > thx.
    >
    > H.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
    > [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com]On Behalf Of Jeffrey
    > Gordon
    > Sent: 07 September 2004 21:32
    > To: Slim Devices Discussion
    > Subject: [slim] Confusion about squeezebox and formats
    >
    >
    > Your collection is in WAV format? How do you tag your files? WAV does
    > not support any type of tagging? Any reason why you choose WAV over say
    > a lossless encoder?
    >
    > Mike Olson wrote:
    >
    > > Jason Holtzapple <jasonholtzapple@...> writes:
    > >
    > >
    > >>Mike Olson wrote:
    > >>
    > >>>I'm a new user (SB on it's way). There's a thread over at audio asylum

    > >
    > > stating
    > >
    > >>>that the squeezebox compress ALL formats to MP3 for playback. Is this

    > >
    > > true?
    > >
    > >>>If so, what is the advantage of using uncompressed or lossless formats?
    > >>
    > >>Not true - they are probably thinking of the earlier SLIMP3 model, not the

    > >
    > > Squeezebox.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Thanks everyone for the info. It looks like someone has already corrected

    > the
    > > mis-information on AudioAsylum. Since my CD collection is already ripped

    > to
    > > WAV, I can breath a sigh of relief and anxiously await the SB arrival.
    > >
    > >
    > >

  3. #3
    Jeffrey Gordon
    Guest

    Confusion about squeezebox and formats

    Well besides saving 35% which can add up with large collections, you get
    a nice tag format too. The WAV tagging that I did not even know was
    possible, I am sure is more of a hack on and probably does not play well
    with many players.

    Also you can create CUE sheets with FLAC and encode as a single file per
    ablum but then you run into tagging issues and rely on the CUE sheet
    again. So if you are doing single file per album you do not gain too
    much with FLAC.

    Howard Darwen wrote:

    >I know you didn't ask me, but I use the guess tags settings to extract tag
    >info from the folder / filename structure. This can cause some problems
    >(e.g. I just ran over the max. windows filepath length with 4 files because
    >of all the tag info ... oooops). I was trying to stick to wavs because I
    >didn't see the point of all the extra encoding to save about 35% of disc
    >space (you can get a 500GB Lacie external disc for about ?300). Also, when I
    >rip a CD I save an EAC CUE sheet so that I can burn the CD again if I ever
    >need to - and that only works with wavs.
    >
    >I also seem to recall that slim supports CUE sheets (but not the proprietary
    >EAC one), which would be another way of getting at least some of the
    >metadata.
    >
    >Having said all that, I am considering moving to FLAC ...
    >
    >thx.
    >
    >H.
    >
    >

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •