Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    28

    Is it better to wire the server or the SB? One has to be on wifi...

    For quality - is it better to have the server wired in the network and the SB on wifi? or the server on wifi and the SB on the network? should one choice be better than the other?

  2. #2
    Founder, Slim Devices seanadams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,879
    If you're using Internet radio or SqueezeNetwork, it would be better to make the Squeezebox wired so it has the best connection ot the internet. If you're streaming from the computer, it doesn't really matter - if you get dropouts one way, try it the other way.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by seanadams View Post
    If you're using Internet radio or SqueezeNetwork, it would be better to make the Squeezebox wired so it has the best connection ot the internet. If you're streaming from the computer, it doesn't really matter - if you get dropouts one way, try it the other way.
    Thanks - i's not for squeezenetwork but for streaming from the computer. moving the cable box/router isn't insignificant for me. right now both are wfi and i'm getting drop-outs. so i have to move the wire to one or the other. which is more likely to fix the problem? i'd rather just move it once.

  4. #4
    Senior Member pfarrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wayne, PA
    Posts
    4,251

    Re: Is it better to wire the server or the SB? One hasto be on wifi...

    bigmdime wrote:
    > Thanks - i's not for squeezenetwork but for streaming from the
    > computer. moving the cable box/router isn't insignificant for me.
    > right now both are wfi and i'm getting drop-outs. so i have to move
    > the wire to one or the other. which is more likely to fix the problem?
    > i'd rather just move it once.


    It is impossible to say remotely. It can depend on wires and pipes in
    the walls, neighbors with microwaves or wireless telephones, etc.

    just test it. Drag cable from each to your switch/router.
    Make sure that fixes it. (sure, it has lousy WAF, but this is just a test).

    Then unplug one, test, plug it back, unplug the other, retest.

    --
    Pat
    http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimse...msoftware.html


  5. #5
    Senior Member JJZolx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    11,531
    Quote Originally Posted by bigmdime View Post
    For quality - is it better to have the server wired in the network and the SB on wifi? or the server on wifi and the SB on the network? should one choice be better than the other?
    Like Pat says, for quality it could go either way. What exactly does your network look like, including the physical layout, locations of the Squeezebox, the server, router/switch, etc? Do you have any other PCs on the network? I'm curious why you say you can only move "the wire" to one or the other - does your router only have a single Ethernet port?

  6. #6
    Marc Sherman
    Guest

    Re: Is it better to wire the server or the SB? One hasto be on wifi...

    seanadams wrote:
    > If you're using Internet radio or SqueezeNetwork, it would be better to
    > make the Squeezebox wired so it has the best connection ot the
    > internet. If you're streaming from the computer, it doesn't really
    > matter - if you get dropouts one way, try it the other way.


    Sean, you missed an important use case here:

    If you're using _transcoded_ internet radio on a local slimserver, such
    as with AlienBBC, then it's important to have your server hard-wired. In
    that use case, a wireless server will cause the internet radio data to
    go over 2 wireless hops (internet->router->wireless->server,
    server->wireless->router->sb), while a wireless SB only contributes one
    wireless hop in that case.

    This also applies for all internet radio on a local slimserver with an
    SB1, which didn't support direct connection to internet radio URLs.

    - Marc

  7. #7

    I'd wire the server

    I've had significantly less trouble with the 802.11g connection from my Squeezebox2 (which I understand to be electrically identical to the current Squeezebox3 players) than the WiFi in my wireless computers. Plus the Slim/Squeezebox protocol uses a significant data buffer, making it unlikely that short-term glitches would affect your listening. It seems much more likely to me that your Slimserver system would flake out on something like Internet Radio due to an intermittent WiFi glitch than your Squeezebox.

    Plus, a WiFi squeezebox can act as a bridge for any Ethernet device you plug into it with a crossover cable -- I've found this an easy way to let guests connect their laptops to the network, though it's certainly more expensive than a WiFi AP running DD_WRT!

    Finally, your PC <-> Internet traffic is likely to have more intersting & sensitive traffic than your PC <-> Squeezebox traffic. Should someone guess/crack your WiFi security key, you're better off with them sniffing your Slimserver traffic than seeing your emails, web searches, etc.

    -Peter

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •