Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Best Stream quality

    I have been enjoying more internet radio particularly Wjzz and I was wondering if there are any options for better sound quality It sounds good but I understand they are mostly 128kbs mp3. Are there any flac quality services or stations. I noticed radioIo has CD quality - What does it mean?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    7,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Tbrooke View Post
    Are there any flac quality services or stations.
    Almost none. I've heard mention of a couple but it's exceedingly rare. The continuing bandwidth demand is very expensive.

    Also the general public views 96 - 128 kbps MP3 as good enough so there's no big drive to change.

    I noticed radioIo has CD quality - What does it mean?
    It's the most misused term ever devised by marketers. It can mean whatever they want it to mean. True "CD quality" is 1411 kbps WAV, although lossless compression like FLAC at ~1000 kbps is identical. Below that, it isn't "CD quality" per se.

    Now I have heard many here say that well-made 256 kbps MP3s sound identical to FLAC, but the fact is that MP3 is not CD quality because if you decompress it to WAV you get a file that's different from the original CD WAV. Whether or not you could hear the difference depends on your hearing and equipment, but a mathematical check will show that the two files are different every time.
    Last edited by Mark Lanctot; 2006-11-27 at 09:40.

  3. #3
    Senior Member gerph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Lanctot View Post
    It's the most misused term ever devised by marketers. It can mean whatever they want it to mean. True "CD quality" is 1440 kbps WAV (snip).
    Ok, you'll have to correct my maths here, 'cos I may be dim. CD = 44100Hz (samples per second). There is stereo data (two channels per sample) and each channel is 16bit. So that's 44100 * 2 * 16 = 1411200 bits per second. Which is 1411.2kps or 1378.125kibps. Neither of which values matches. What's the difference ?

    Personally I wouldn't use the phrase 'WAV' anywhere near talking about quality as it can contain all manner of data formats, but each to their own.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    7,103
    Quote Originally Posted by gerph View Post
    Ok, you'll have to correct my maths here, 'cos I may be dim. CD = 44100Hz (samples per second). There is stereo data (two channels per sample) and each channel is 16bit. So that's 44100 * 2 * 16 = 1411200 bits per second. Which is 1411.2kps or 1378.125kibps. Neither of which values matches. What's the difference ?
    Whoops, my memory was off here, it's 1411 kbps of course. Edit coming up.

    Personally I wouldn't use the phrase 'WAV' anywhere near talking about quality as it can contain all manner of data formats, but each to their own.
    I wanted to refer to the raw bitstream coming off the CD, and WAV is the closest you get to it. Of course lossless formats are equivalent in quality because they're bit-perfect. I did clearly mention this in my post.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Wombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,151
    I am not using these streaming services but i think some stations offer ogg streams meanwhile. At 96kHz it already can sound surprisingly good imho.

  6. #6
    Senior Member gerph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Lanctot View Post
    Whoops, my memory was off here, it's 1411 kbps of course. Edit coming up.
    Phew! I thought for a second that my mind was going more than it already is :-)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •