Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Rob Funk
    Guest

    Re: Hanging perl

    OK, I've tried to stay quiet about the excessive quoting and top-posting
    (especially since the primary software developer is a primary offender),
    but this is getting ridiculous. Do we really need to see that entire call
    graph reposted for every "Hanging perl" post?

    Those messages have so much quoted material that the last two digests had
    only two messages each, with only about half a dozen (or less!) lines of
    actual content in each message. (The mail system sends out a digest
    either once a day or when the collected size of messages reaches a certain
    threshold.)

    --
    ==============================| "A slice of life isn't the whole cake
    Rob Funk <rfunk (AT) funknet (DOT) net> | One tooth will never make a full grin"
    http://www.funknet.net/rfunk | -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind"

  2. #2
    Roy M. Silvernail
    Guest

    Meta: Reply formatting

    On Monday 10 November 2003 00:16, Rob Funk wrote:
    > OK, I've tried to stay quiet about the excessive quoting and top-posting
    > (especially since the primary software developer is a primary offender),
    > but this is getting ridiculous. Do we really need to see that entire call
    > graph reposted for every "Hanging perl" post?


    +1

    Once upon a time, newsreaders wouldn't let you post an item unless the ratio
    of new text to quoted text was > 1:1. That was, perhaps, extreme, but
    certainly the full text of a thread need not be quoted with every reply. Top
    posting is annoying at best. It pretty much requires one to read the whole of
    the quoted material and infer what the reply is referring to.

    A quick scan of the Mailman docs doesn't show up an attachment policy, but if
    allowed, logfiles and such should be sent as attachments. That would prevent
    them from being quoted by default. Top posting is a habit that each user will
    have to break on his/her own, but it's a habit well worth breaking. (it's
    unfortunate that mail clients such as Outlook and Lotus Notes by default
    format inclusions in a way that encourages top posting)

    These issues affect archiving as well. Excessive quoting means searching the
    archives will yield more false hits. A little attention to detail up front
    will make the lists more useful now and in the future.

    A Public Service Announcement from the Coalition for Readable and Archivable
    Postings, which thanks you for your support.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •