Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Jacob Potter
    Guest

    What should I fix?

    Hi all -

    I've been looking to improve the sound on my SB2 system a bit, so I'm
    trying to figure out what I should do to get the best bang for the
    buck. My current setup is:
    - SB2 wired
    - Grado SR80s on SB2 headphone output

    The obvious thing is to get a proper headphone amp; from what I've
    seen on Headwize, the "Apheared 47" design is ideal for Grados (it's a
    bit higher-end than the standard CMOY, but nothing too fancy). But
    here on the SB2 list, the most popular upgrade seems to be an improved
    power supply.

    Would a simple AC wall-wart -> rectifier -> 7805 -> bunch-o'-caps be a
    worthwhile improvement over the stock supply? Or should I focus on the
    amplifier first? Are my Grados even good enough to not be the weakest
    link themselves?

    Any suggestions appreciated

    - Jacob

  2. #2
    Senior Member pfarrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wayne, PA
    Posts
    4,251

    What should I fix?

    On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 21:44 -0400, Jacob Potter wrote:
    > The obvious thing is to get a proper headphone amp; from what I've
    > seen on Headwize, the "Apheared 47" design is ideal for Grados (it's a
    > bit higher-end than the standard CMOY, but nothing too fancy). But
    > here on the SB2 list, the most popular upgrade seems to be an improved
    > power supply.


    I would recommend you be careful making judgements based on how
    popular mods are. First, upgrading the power supply is easy
    and fairly cheap, so even if it doesn't do much for most
    listeners.

    Second, I think most of the folks on this list have mid-level
    or higher speakers, so they are not likely to think of headphone
    amps. I know I haven't used headphones for serious listening in
    at least thirty years.



    > Would a simple AC wall-wart -> rectifier -> 7805 -> bunch-o'-caps be a
    > worthwhile improvement over the stock supply?


    I am not a circuit designer, but I have a hard time imagining that this
    would do anything good. The best you can say is that it would be cheap.
    The reason everything uses cheap switching power supplies is that
    they deliver a lot of bang for the buck. By setting the switching
    circuit frequency over 20kHz, you don't have to worry about
    noise in the circuit, your approach is sure to have some 60hz
    noise flowing thru. Clearly you could use lots-o-bunches-o caps
    but that is not elegant and stops improving pretty quickly.

    Why not just stick a bunch-o-caps on the current power supply?

    I think that if I was living on headphones only, I'd look for
    some electrostatic headphones first, and then look for
    a really good tube headphone amp.

    But what you really need are some Quads :-)

    --
    Pat
    http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimse...msoftware.html



  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    753
    Second, I think most of the folks on this list have mid-level
    or higher speakers, so they are not likely to think of headphone
    amps. I know I haven't used headphones for serious listening in
    at least thirty years.
    Pat, I think that disqualifies you from comment. Headphone technology and quality today is unrecognisable from that of 30 years ago. It's a commonly held viewpoint that decent headphones can deliver sound quality that you would have to pay 5 to 10 times more on to match with speakers. There are also some stunning headphone amp designs around.

    SR-80s are excellent headphones for the money. They were my first pair of 'serious' cans and I still use them regularly. My main headphones just now are Sennheiser HD650s which, paired with my WNA HeadAmp Mk2 provide amazing sound quality for the price. I must admit a soft spot for the Grado sound though.

    My experience is that the SB drives SR-80s surprisingly well, but a decent headphone amp should provide a significant improvement. Spend a bit of time on Head-Fi to get a flavour of what's available. You don't have to spend a fortune to get decent sound with headphones and even less if you can handle a soldering iron.

  4. #4
    Senior Member pfarrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wayne, PA
    Posts
    4,251

    Re: What should I fix?

    On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 06:22 -0700, Fifer wrote:
    > > . I know I haven't used headphones for serious listening in
    > > at least thirty years.
    > >

    > Pat, I think that disqualifies you from comment. Headphone
    > technology and quality today is unrecognisable from that of 30 years
    > ago. It's a commonly held viewpoint that decent headphones can deliver
    > sound quality that you would have to pay 5 to 10 times more on to match
    > with speakers.


    What part is unrecognizable? Good headphones have sounded very good
    and were lots cheaper than amps and speakers. I see that Koss is
    still selling the Pro4-AA that I used thirty years ago.

    The cool part of headphone technology is that you only need a handful of
    watts to drive any of them. And making a flea powered amp is tons
    easier (and lots cheaper) than one that puts out hundreds of watts.

    And if I need only a couple of watts, tubes is the way to go.

    > There are also some stunning headphone amp designs
    > around.


    No argument from me. I have fifteen or twenty pairs of headphones
    that I use all the time in my recording studio. I currently
    prefer the Sennheiser HD-280. There are lots of good ones.

    But when I listen to music seriously, I don't use headphones.
    YMMV

    --
    Pat Farrell PRC recording studio
    http://www.pfarrell.com/PRC



  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    753
    What part is unrecognizable?
    It's a fair cop, my choice of words was poor. I should have said 'headphone technology and quality have come a long way in 30 years'. The point I was trying to make was that 30 years ago, the choice of high quality headphones was fairly limited and what was available was fairly expensive. There is a much wider selection available now and very good quality to be had for reasonable amounts of money.

  6. #6
    Senior Member pfarrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wayne, PA
    Posts
    4,251

    Re: What should I fix?

    On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 08:51 -0700, Fifer wrote:
    > 'headphone technology and quality have come a long way in 30 years'.
    > The point I was trying to make was that 30 years ago, the choice of
    > high quality headphones was fairly limited and what was available was
    > fairly expensive. There is a much wider selection available now and
    > very good quality to be had for reasonable amounts of money.


    I'll agree that the quality you can get per dollar today is much
    better, and there are lots more choices. Driven I think by all the
    walkmen, diskmen and now iPods.

    But the technology hasn't changed any at all that I can see.
    Except that there were no small, in ear systems 30 years ago.
    And there were no ear-bud styles earlier than about 15 or so years ago.

    But the drivers are still either dynamic or electrostatic.
    I don't know if any ribbon drivers, but ribbons are 50+ year old
    technology. And the electrostatic still are big and expensive and
    wonderful.

    What has changed is that the dymanic drivers are lots better at lower
    price points. And they are more comfortable to wear, lighter, etc.

    Of course, I'm not sure what technology changes have to be made to
    change the technology. Do new ways to manufacture a mature design
    count as new technology?

    --
    Pat
    http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimse...msoftware.html



  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    753
    But the technology hasn't changed any at all that I can see.
    Except that there were no small, in ear systems 30 years ago.
    And there were no ear-bud styles earlier than about 15 or so years ago.
    I suppose you've partly answered your own question, but aside of the miniaturisation that allows Shure and Ety to make their stunning in-ear systems, materials technology has improved with new cone, conductor, magnetic and housing materials being used and manufacturing technology has improved allowing better driver matching, closer tolerances in driver assembly and better ways of making driver housings. These are evolutionary technological improvements rather than revolutionary new technologies I admit, but major improvements nonetheless.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    18
    Something like a PIMETA should be more than sufficient. I understand it grew out from the Apheared design (in fact, I further understand that the A in PIMETA is for Apheared). JMT Audio builds PIMETA amps in Transportable, Portable and Home (probably the best option) versions.

    Headphones. The SR80's are fine, but I suppose it depends on the budget and style of listening. Personally speaking, I've never been a Grado fan. For all-purpose listening with a pop/rock bent though, I guess you could do a lot worse than the SR80's for about that ballpark price. Your budget and listening will dictate the recommendation and you're best off going to Head-Fi for that sort of stuff. Youo can certainly do better in all sorts of ways than the SR80 and I don't think with a decent headphone amp the Squeezebox will be the limiting component, but you might need to pay more than you expected for real step up.

    On the matter of headphone+amp usage, a DAC-amp seems to do a better job in my view but the analog outs certainly are not a slouch. Frankly speaking, I was seriously surprised at how good even the Sennheiser Orpheus sounded directly from the SB's analog ports. Perhaps it was a case of low expectations, but I was genuinely taken aback at the results.
    Last edited by pasodoble; 2005-10-02 at 16:18.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •