Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    135

    Stability of 6.1 vs. 5.4

    Long time "slimophyte." I have 3 Squeezeboxen1 utilizing the last 5.4.1 branch under Windows with no problems... it's rock solid. I like to avoid the "early version blues" so I've been waiting for v6 to stabilize before retiring v5.

    Anyone care to comment on the overall performance of the current 6.1 public release and how it compares to 5.4? Are crashes common? Skips? Dead air? Etc? Etc? Etc?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    85
    The 6.1 release appears to be far more stable to me than 5.4 is/was. Watching the CVS commits shows many core improvements that have been occurring.


    Quote Originally Posted by bishopdonmiguel
    Long time "slimophyte." I have 3 Squeezeboxen1 utilizing the last 5.4.1 branch under Windows with no problems... it's rock solid. I like to avoid the "early version blues" so I've been waiting for v6 to stabilize before retiring v5.

    Anyone care to comment on the overall performance of the current 6.1 public release and how it compares to 5.4? Are crashes common? Skips? Dead air? Etc? Etc? Etc?

  3. #3
    dijon
    Guest

    Stability of 6.1 vs. 5.4

    i'm in the 'don't fix it if it's working' school. i'm still running 5.4.1
    under linux and haven't rebooted in months. i do occasionally lose
    connection to slimserver and have the occasional wireless issues (not
    related) due to the distance from my AP but i'm quite happy. i also never
    use the 'browse music folder' which *is* painful under 5.x . if i needed
    that i'd consider upgrading. i will probably go to 6.x eventually when the
    post-new release bug chatter dies down a bit.

    really, i'm waiting for the compilation album issue to be resolved which
    will bring my artist count (and time it takes to scroll through artists)
    down by almost 20%. see:

    http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "bishopdonmiguel"
    <bishopdonmiguel.1ttrfz (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.slimdevices.com>
    To: <discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com>
    Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:25 PM
    Subject: [slim] Stability of 6.1 vs. 5.4


    >
    > Long time "slimophyte." I have 3 Squeezeboxen1 utilizing the last 5.4.1
    > branch under Windows with no problems... it's rock solid. I like to
    > avoid the "early version blues" so I've been waiting for v6 to
    > stabilize before retiring v5.
    >
    > Anyone care to comment on the overall performance of the current 6.1
    > public release and how it compares to 5.4? Are crashes common? Skips?
    > Dead air? Etc? Etc? Etc?
    >
    >
    > --
    > bishopdonmiguel
    >

  4. #4
    Marc Sherman
    Guest

    Re: Stability of 6.1 vs. 5.4

    tgoldstone wrote:
    > The 6.1 release appears to be far more stable to me than 5.4 is/was.
    > Watching the CVS commits shows many core improvements that have been
    > occurring.


    Those two statements kind of contradict each other, don't they? 6.x
    will be truly stable once the core improvements stop getting committed
    on a regular basis.

    - Marc, still running 5.4.1 for the very same reason*

    * With an added pinch of "My wife won't tolerate a broken computer in
    the living room"

  5. #5
    Senior Member radish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Red Bank, NJ
    Posts
    5,052
    Quote Originally Posted by dijon
    really, i'm waiting for the compilation album issue to be resolved which
    will bring my artist count (and time it takes to scroll through artists)
    down by almost 20%.
    I'm planning on trying the new version with that functionality too - but the reduction should be more dramatic for me (~3300 down to 270). From the threads I've been reading I'm not convinced it's perfect for my situation yet but it certainly looks like an improvement.

  6. #6
    Gregory Forrest
    Guest

    Stability of 6.1 vs. 5.4

    While I have the same "don't fix it" philosophy on major Windows
    applications, I have been regularly upgrading (5.4.1 through 6.1) and have
    found significantly less reliability and browser speed on the 6.X versions
    (I use a laptop and IE to control SlimServer running on another CPU). The
    5.4.x was really rock solid for me as well. I have had more server crashes
    with 6.1, and more problems with internet radio as well.

    But - I do have faith that this will eventually be resolved. I still do
    recommened the SB to friends, but I am getting tired of providing technical
    support for them....

    Greg
    >
    > i'm in the 'don't fix it if it's working' school. i'm still running 5.4.1
    > under linux and haven't rebooted in months. i do occasionally lose
    > connection to slimserver and have the occasional wireless issues (not
    > related) due to the distance from my AP but i'm quite happy. i also never
    > use the 'browse music folder' which *is* painful under 5.x . if i needed
    > that i'd consider upgrading. i will probably go to 6.x eventually when the
    > post-new release bug chatter dies down a bit.
    >
    > really, i'm waiting for the compilation album issue to be resolved which
    > will bring my artist count (and time it takes to scroll through artists)
    > down by almost 20%. see:
    >
    > http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288
    >




  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    357

    Stability of 6.1 vs. 5.4

    > Anyone care to comment on the overall performance of the current 6.1
    > public release and how it compares to 5.4? Are crashes common? Skips?
    > Dead air? Etc? Etc? Etc?


    I've been using the 6.1 nightlies since early May, currently using the
    6.1.x nightlies. I've never had SlimServer crash and no gaps (other
    than a bug related to sync'ed players), stalls etc.

    All on XP with ~13000 flac tracks played by 2 x SB2 and 1 x SBG.

    Richard

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    135
    Great info and thanks for the responses. I think I'll give the 6.x branch some more time to mature and stay with 5.4.1 for now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •