SN firmware update

[Triode]

Could I propose that SN is less aggressive about downgrading firmware versions?

I would suggest it may want to upgrade if really necessary, but if someone run a recent server it should be the server that does
maintains the latest version and SN should not try to change it.

[At present trunk and SN are out of sync so each time you switch between SN or SS wants to change firmware. As the same thing
happened at the last firmware rev I think this is a problem worth thinking about!]

Adrian

[Dan Sully]

* Triode shaped the electrons to say...

>Could I propose that SN is less aggressive about downgrading firmware
>versions?
>
>I would suggest it may want to upgrade if really necessary, but if someone
>run a recent server it should be the server that does maintains the latest
>version and SN should not try to change it.
>
>[At present trunk and SN are out of sync so each time you switch between SN
>or SS wants to change firmware. As the same thing happened at the last
>firmware rev I think this is a problem worth thinking about!]

Yes - I need to roll out a new version of SN that will fix this.

-D
--
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people "maintaining a free civil government.
This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always
avail themselves for their own purposes." --Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, 1813.

[fcm4711]

I agree. SN should not insist on 'downgrading' a SB2.
Felix

[Dan Sully]

* fcm4711 shaped the electrons to say...

>I agree. SN should not insist on 'downgrading' a SB2.

I've updated SN. It shouldn't do it anymore.

-D
--
<iNoah> I think someone should create a magazine for computer peripherals, called Card & Driver