Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    164

    Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    Has anyone else using the above combination noticed that the server
    page takes a lot longer to appear (26 seconds) than when using 10.3.8
    and the previous version of Safari? It didn't seem to take as long
    before.
    After it appears everything is okay.

    Slim 6.0.2 - 3085, Mac os 10.4, safari 2.0

  2. #2
    Gadfly, Former Founder Slim Devices dean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    4,427

    Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    I'm running that here and haven't noticed it.

    Can you describe the exact sequence of events (i.e. when you start
    counting and when you stop and what you do before and during that time)?


    On May 12, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Steven Moore wrote:

    > Has anyone else using the above combination noticed that the server
    > page takes a lot longer to appear (26 seconds) than when using
    > 10.3.8 and the previous version of Safari? It didn't seem to take
    > as long before.
    > After it appears everything is okay.
    >
    > Slim 6.0.2 - 3085, Mac os 10.4, safari 2.0
    >

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    164

    Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    Hi,
    I did a bit of experimenting.
    It seems that it only takes this long to open the web interface the
    first time you use it since starting up the machine and since I may
    not go to the web interface first thing it will be later on in the day.
    I'll try and use the Web interface tomorrow first thing and see if it
    is different.
    At any time after that even after clearing the cache the web
    interface comes up within seconds.

    Could the sever be getting paged out or something?
    As I say it's no problem I was just wondering if anyone else had
    noticed this.

    Steven Moore
    On May 12, 2005, at 6:25 PM, dean blackketter wrote:

    > I'm running that here and haven't noticed it.
    >
    > Can you describe the exact sequence of events (i.e. when you start
    > counting and when you stop and what you do before and during that
    > time)?
    >
    >
    > On May 12, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Steven Moore wrote:
    >
    >
    >> Has anyone else using the above combination noticed that the
    >> server page takes a lot longer to appear (26 seconds) than when
    >> using 10.3.8 and the previous version of Safari? It didn't seem to
    >> take as long before.
    >> After it appears everything is okay.
    >>
    >> Slim 6.0.2 - 3085, Mac os 10.4, safari 2.0
    >>

  4. #4
    Craig, James (IT)
    Guest

    Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    Steven,
    Do you have a populated client playlist displayed when you open the
    interface?

    My experience (Windows/Firefox) is that this is validated against the
    database before display.
    Subsequent re-opening of the interface or the initial one with an empty
    playlist are much faster

    James

    -----Original Message-----
    From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
    [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com] On Behalf Of Steven Moore
    Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:16 PM
    To: Slim Devices Discussion
    Subject: Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    Hi,
    I did a bit of experimenting.
    It seems that it only takes this long to open the web interface the
    first time you use it since starting up the machine and since I may not
    go to the web interface first thing it will be later on in the day.
    I'll try and use the Web interface tomorrow first thing and see if it is
    different.
    At any time after that even after clearing the cache the web interface
    comes up within seconds.

    Could the sever be getting paged out or something?
    As I say it's no problem I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed
    this.

    Steven Moore
    O
    --------------------------------------------------------

    NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.


  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    164

    Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    Yes there normally is a populated playlist, usually around 10-30 tracks

    Steven Moore
    On May 12, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Craig, James (IT) wrote:

    > Steven,
    > Do you have a populated client playlist displayed when you open the
    > interface?
    >
    > My experience (Windows/Firefox) is that this is validated against the
    > database before display.
    > Subsequent re-opening of the interface or the initial one with an
    > empty
    > playlist are much faster
    >
    > James
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
    > [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com] On Behalf Of Steven
    > Moore
    > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:16 PM
    > To: Slim Devices Discussion
    > Subject: Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.
    >
    > Hi,
    > I did a bit of experimenting.
    > It seems that it only takes this long to open the web interface the
    > first time you use it since starting up the machine and since I may
    > not
    > go to the web interface first thing it will be later on in the day.
    > I'll try and use the Web interface tomorrow first thing and see if
    > it is
    > different.
    > At any time after that even after clearing the cache the web interface
    > comes up within seconds.
    >
    > Could the sever be getting paged out or something?
    > As I say it's no problem I was just wondering if anyone else had
    > noticed
    > this.
    >
    > Steven Moore
    > O
    > --------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.
    > Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is
    > prohibited.
    >
    >

  6. #6
    Craig, James (IT)
    Guest

    Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

    Hmm thought so.
    I believe that playlists are not yet stored in the database and I am
    hoping when they are this will no longer happen...
    http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459

    James
    --------------------------------------------------------

    NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •