Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Logitech SqueezeBox replacement for under $30

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Triode
    Can't match $30, but another alternative is the CuBox ... the sock firmware will run squeezelite and supports usb audio and async hifi dacs. It's about 3 times the price of the Pi, but its doing what I envisaged Squeezelite could do on an arm like device. Plus there's an hdmi display and ir port which could be made to do something useful too...
    It has 1Gb ram for what I see. Do you think it can pull SBS and keep playing music ? (With the music drive on e-SATA, not USB)
    Now that Michael has offered us an alternative to MIP, the ARM platform is really tempting.
    2 SB 3 • 1 PCP 7 • Libratone Loop, Zipp, Zipp Mini • iPeng (iPhone + iPad) • LMS 8.1 (docker) with plugins: CD Player, WaveInput by bpa • Material Skin by Craig Drummond • IRBlaster by Gwendesign (Felix) • Smart Mix, Music Walk With Me, What Was That Tune? by Michael Herger • PowerSave by Jason Holtzapple • Song Info, Song Lyrics by Erland Isaksson • BBC Sounds by Stuart McLean • AirPlay Bridge by philippe_44 • Auto Dim Display, SaverSwitcher, ContextMenu by Peter Watkins.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by agillis
      There has been a lot of discussion in this forum about a replacement for the SqueezeBox. I worked on this problem over the holiday and I think I came up with a good solution. Using a low cost ARM based system I was able to build a box that basically does everything the SqueezeBox does for under $30. Even a unit with analog and optical/COAX SPDIF out can be built for under $60.

      http://vortexbox.org/content/149-Log...t-for-under-30
      Parts ordered, thank you for this information!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Triode
        Can't match $30, but another alternative is the CuBox: http://www.solid-run.com/products/cubox
        One other interesting feature of this device is that it has optical SPDIF out, so may be a good match for non-USB DACs.
        Until recently: Transporter -> ATC SCM100A, now sold :-(
        House move forced change to: piCorePlayer(RPi2/HiFiBerry DIGI2 Pro) -> Meridian 218 -> Meridian M6

        Comment


        • #34
          re: non-USB DAC. I plan to try the VAMP solution with a Turtle Beach USB output card. Total cost less than $60.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by agillis
            As for wifi this would be required to make this a true replacement for the SqueezeBox.
            No, there's a hell of a lot more than that needed to make this an actual replacement for the Squeezebox.

            - wifi
            - display
            - infrared receiver and remote control
            - internal DAC
            - analog out
            - optical S/PDIF out
            - coax S/PDIF out

            This is a DIY project at best.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Triode
              Unfortunately that method doesn't work with my dac - setting "dwc_otg.speed=1" means it can't connect. For those dacs using less of the usb bus its probably a good step, but I'm hoping they can fully resolve the packet loss issue as without doing so its not really appropriate for hifi dacs (my target)
              Yes - the Pi should be a really good solution. Currently, I'm using HDMI output using the onboard sound card, and it doesn't have any of the poor sound quality issues of the onboard dac, but does seem to be limited to 48K max output. As Triode says, USB Dacs do seem to have some basic packet loss issues at the moment - hopefully they'll fix them.
              Last edited by psketch; 2013-01-04, 16:51.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by JJZolx
                No, there's a hell of a lot more than that needed to make this an actual replacement for the Squeezebox.

                - wifi
                - display
                - infrared receiver and remote control
                - internal DAC
                - analog out
                - optical S/PDIF out
                - coax S/PDIF out

                This is a DIY project at best.
                I already have a unit here with

                - WiFi
                - DAC
                - analog out
                - optical S/PDIF out
                - coax S/PDIF out

                The total cost is still way under $100. I also have one with a built in amp and speakers. (boom replacement) I'll be discussing these in future articles. The only two things I don't have is

                - Display
                - Infrared receiver and remote control

                It would be easy to add both of these to the project but it would add anther $130 to the cost!! Since an iPod touch v4 is only $199 why would we want a display or remote?

                I guess when I say SqueezeBox replacement I'm replacing the SqueezeBox Receiver not the Touch.
                rip, tag, get cover art… All you do is insert the CD!
                http://vortexbox.org

                agillis
                Lead Developer VortexBox

                Comment


                • #38
                  With the prevelance of iPods, iPhones, and Andriod devices, I think it's reasonable to put forth a squeezebox replacement without a display and rely on another device for the display/control. It seems to be working well for Sonos.

                  The the big issue to solve is configuration - how do you make that not a completely geeky endeavour without the problems that the duet had.
                  Rich
                  ---------
                  Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod Touch, SqueezeCommander, OrangeSqueeze, and SqueezePlayer on Xoom and Galaxy Player 4.2. CentOS 6.3 Server running LogitechMediaServer 7.7.2 and SqueezeSlave.
                  Current library stats: 40,810 songs, 3,153 albums, 582 artists.
                  http://www.last.fm/user/maggior

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by maggior

                    The the big issue to solve is configuration - how do you make that not a completely geeky endeavour without the problems that the duet had.
                    Well that’s not to hard use an on-board web-UI or an helper app running on your computer or why not both like my ethernet to ir adapter and ethernet to serial com adapter (itach) .
                    --------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Main hifi: Rasbery PI digi+ MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub.
                    Bedroom/Office: Boom
                    Loggia: Raspi hifiberry dac + Adams
                    Bathroom : Radio (with battery)
                    iPad with iPengHD & SqueezePad
                    (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller )
                    server Intel NUC Esxi VM Linux mint 18 LMS 7.9.2

                    http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Great initiative

                      I just wanted to shout out that I think this is a fantastic initiative to keep the Squeezebox ecosystem alive.
                      The Raspberry Pi already drew my attention but I read that is has some nasty audio quality flukes (in the current Model B version at least), but the pogoplug in combination with a decent USB DAC sounds like a VERY viable plan!

                      Too bad the Pogoplug is so expensive in the Netherlands.

                      Triode and Agillis : keep up the great work!!!

                      BTW ; if the Squeezelite package is picked up by the masses using the pogoplugs, raspberry pi's etc, it might just become the audio equivalent of XBMC. And that means a GREAT future for the Squeezebox ecosystem!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by agillis
                        The only two things I don't have is

                        - Display
                        - Infrared receiver and remote control

                        It would be easy to add both of these to the project but it would add anther $130 to the cost!! Since an iPod touch v4 is only $199 why would we want a display or remote?

                        I guess when I say SqueezeBox replacement I'm replacing the SqueezeBox Receiver not the Touch.
                        Both IR and display is important to be able to replace my Classic or Touch, the issue is that I currently control them with a Harmony IR remote. The display is easy to solve, I can just place a iPod Touch or Android device in a docking station beside it with one of the available apps always running, it's the IR support which is going to cause me a head ache.

                        In similar fashion the on device controls and displays is really important to be able to replace any of my Squeezebox Radio's.

                        So as you suggest we are probably talking about a Squeezebox Receiver replacement/alternative rather than a generic Squeezebox replacement, but it's definitely good to have an alternative even if it isn't the perfect replacement of all Squeezebox models, so keep up the good work.
                        Erland Lindmark (My homepage)
                        Developer of many plugins/applets
                        Starting with LMS 8.0 I no longer support my plugins/applets (see here for more information )

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by MarcelG
                          BTW ; if the Squeezelite package is picked up by the masses using the pogoplugs, raspberry pi's etc
                          To reach the masses, you need to put it on the shelves in the local warehouses worldwide, doing that is going to be a completely different challenge and I believe it's also going to require a bit less geeky physical design than what we have seen on the alternatives so far, after all it's a device which non geeks must be willing to place in the center of their living room. Reaching the masses isn't impossible but I think a more realistic goal is to reach a lot of geeks and DIY wannabes on this forum.
                          Erland Lindmark (My homepage)
                          Developer of many plugins/applets
                          Starting with LMS 8.0 I no longer support my plugins/applets (see here for more information )

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Running a Pi with truehl's Squeezeplug for LMS and Triode's Squeezelite via Mini Boombox - sounds great to me - no audio issues. Controllable via Squeezeplay on PC, and Logitech controller app on android.
                            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Very interesting work. How's the sync performance between these devices? How about sync with hardware SBs?
                              1x SB1, 3x SB1g, 1x SB2, 1x SB3, 2x Booms

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by azinck3
                                Very interesting work. How's the sync performance between these devices? How about sync with hardware SBs?
                                Sync seems pretty decent with my Boom and Transporter :-)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎