LSM 8.3 & i386

[Man in a van]

> But again, honestly, who knows how many folks still have i386 hardware
> lying around gathering dust that they'd want to slap a LMS on?

>I tend to only support a platform once there's been demand for it. But
>the definition of "demand" remains a bit flexible. One voice usually
>isn't enough...



Amen ! I can vouch for that

The thing is; people with 32 bit "stuff" are being frozen out, all over the place, someone should put Greta on the case

ronnie

[mherger]

LSM 8.3 & i386

> But again, honestly, who knows how many folks still have i386 hardware
> lying around gathering dust that they'd want to slap a LMS on?

I tend to only support a platform once there's been demand for it. But
the definition of "demand" remains a bit flexible. One voice usually
isn't enough...

[gharris999]

If you're referring to running buildme.sh, no, I didn't do that. This was just an experimental install, and since my experience with running buildme.sh on underpowered hardware like this is that it's a considerable time investment, I thought I'd just post the FYI here.

I'm assuming that Debian is considered a supported platform, and since it's one of the few remaining distros that supports i386, I thought you'd want to know about the install fail.

But again, honestly, who knows how many folks still have i386 hardware lying around gathering dust that they'd want to slap a LMS on?

[mherger]

Did you follow the instructions given at the bottom of the above error message? It’s the most important of them all.