Player only model

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard

    Player only model

    Since cents are being given freely...

    How about player only with a video output of the player interface. This
    combined with IR remote control could yield a TV based control. Properly
    modulated it could be used throughout the house. (For those few rooms
    without PC's)

    Thanks,

    Richard

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jean-Stéfane Bergeron [mailto:j.s.bergeron (AT) canada (DOT) com]
    Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 12:39 PM
    To: 'Slim Devices Discussion'
    Subject: [slim] Player only model

    I also strongly believe there is a market for "player only" players.

    In whole home or commercial settings, the display is not needed for many
    players. For instance, in a commercial setting, a restaurant, retail outlet
    would start it and forget it. They would probably use the web front end to
    create playlists and control the player. They would probably use a hardware
    volume control for volume. As for a whole home system, since one would
    probably use the players synced with another player, I could see a player
    serving an outside space being used without a display or traditional remote.

    My two cents.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
    [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com] On Behalf Of ron thigpen
    Sent: 13-Aug-04 10:29 AM
    To: Slim Devices Discussion
    Subject: [slim] Player only model

    Eric Gauthier wrote:
    > Given the new display, this may be taboo to talk about, but are there
    > any thoughts about a player only Squeezebox?


    At the right price, I'd certainly be in the market for one or two of these.

    --rt
  • anthony webb

    #2
    Player only model

    WOw, what a great idea!!!
    Count me in for one of these!

    -Anthony

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Richard" <crap (AT) musiceverywhere (DOT) com>
    To: "'Slim Devices Discussion'" <discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com>
    Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 10:11 AM
    Subject: [slim] Player only model


    > Since cents are being given freely...
    >
    > How about player only with a video output of the player interface. This
    > combined with IR remote control could yield a TV based control. Properly
    > modulated it could be used throughout the house. (For those few rooms
    > without PC's)
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Richard
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jean-Stéfane Bergeron [mailto:j.s.bergeron (AT) canada (DOT) com]
    > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 12:39 PM
    > To: 'Slim Devices Discussion'
    > Subject: [slim] Player only model
    >
    > I also strongly believe there is a market for "player only" players.
    >
    > In whole home or commercial settings, the display is not needed for many
    > players. For instance, in a commercial setting, a restaurant, retail

    outlet
    > would start it and forget it. They would probably use the web front end to
    > create playlists and control the player. They would probably use a

    hardware
    > volume control for volume. As for a whole home system, since one would
    > probably use the players synced with another player, I could see a player
    > serving an outside space being used without a display or traditional

    remote.
    >
    > My two cents.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
    > [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com] On Behalf Of ron thigpen
    > Sent: 13-Aug-04 10:29 AM
    > To: Slim Devices Discussion
    > Subject: [slim] Player only model
    >
    > Eric Gauthier wrote:
    > > Given the new display, this may be taboo to talk about, but are there
    > > any thoughts about a player only Squeezebox?

    >
    > At the right price, I'd certainly be in the market for one or two of

    these.
    >
    > --rt
    >

    Comment

    • Ken Anderson

      #3
      Player only model

      When I asked about such a device a while back (it would be PERFECT for
      whole house audio/video), it was suggested I just buy multiple
      squeezeboxes and sync them In fact, by pointing a video camera at
      mine, it's kinda similar (but nowhere near as nice!).

      On Aug 13, 2004, at 5:11 PM, anthony webb wrote:

      > WOw, what a great idea!!!
      > Count me in for one of these!
      >
      > -Anthony
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: "Richard" <crap (AT) musiceverywhere (DOT) com>
      > To: "'Slim Devices Discussion'" <discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com>
      > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 10:11 AM
      > Subject: [slim] Player only model
      >
      >
      >> Since cents are being given freely...
      >>
      >> How about player only with a video output of the player interface.
      >> This
      >> combined with IR remote control could yield a TV based control.
      >> Properly
      >> modulated it could be used throughout the house. (For those few rooms
      >> without PC's)
      >>
      >> Thanks,
      >>
      >> Richard
      >>
      >> -----Original Message-----
      >> From: Jean-Stéfane Bergeron [mailto:j.s.bergeron (AT) canada (DOT) com]
      >> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 12:39 PM
      >> To: 'Slim Devices Discussion'
      >> Subject: [slim] Player only model
      >>
      >> I also strongly believe there is a market for "player only" players.
      >>
      >> In whole home or commercial settings, the display is not needed for
      >> many
      >> players. For instance, in a commercial setting, a restaurant, retail

      > outlet
      >> would start it and forget it. They would probably use the web front
      >> end to
      >> create playlists and control the player. They would probably use a

      > hardware
      >> volume control for volume. As for a whole home system, since one would
      >> probably use the players synced with another player, I could see a
      >> player
      >> serving an outside space being used without a display or traditional

      > remote.
      >>
      >> My two cents.
      >>
      >> -----Original Message-----
      >> From: discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
      >> [mailto:discuss-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com] On Behalf Of ron
      >> thigpen
      >> Sent: 13-Aug-04 10:29 AM
      >> To: Slim Devices Discussion
      >> Subject: [slim] Player only model
      >>
      >> Eric Gauthier wrote:
      >>> Given the new display, this may be taboo to talk about, but are there
      >>> any thoughts about a player only Squeezebox?

      >>
      >> At the right price, I'd certainly be in the market for one or two of

      > these.
      >>
      >> --rt
      >>

      Comment

      Working...