PDA

View Full Version : Wired or Wireless?



Ken Hokugo
2004-08-10, 12:34
More explanation may be needed :-)

1. I use a stand alone DA converter in my audio system, and SB digital out
(coax) is connected to this DAC's digital in, then analog out to my
amplifier... The same goes for the convenstional CD trasnport.

2. For comparison, the exactly same digital cable (coax) is used between
either SB or the CD transport and the DAC. Simply swapping between the two
of them.


Ken


From: "Ken Hokugo" <khokugo (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
Reply-To: Slim Devices Discussion <discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com>
To: discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
Subject: [slim] Wired or Wireless?
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:04:42 -0400

Hello,

I have been enjoying Squeezebox ("SB") for the past few weeks and been
impressed with its easiness and flexibility. Yesterday, for the first time
since SB purchase, I compared the same CD between SB and my hi-end CD
transport. The CD had been ripped via iTunes in WAV format with USB Plextor
Premium CD-RW drive at its highest speed without "error correction". The PC
is brand-new Dell 8400. SB is wireless. Signal strength is between 50 to
60% (PC is in the next room). The CD is brand new classical piano solo.

Long story short, to my ears, using CD transport sounds more open, dynamic
and detailed. Scoreing the hi-end CD transport at 10, SB sound is, like, 8.
Not surprising (well, sort of...), but is this because (1) wireless signal
is not strong enough? (2) ripping speed is too fast? or (3) something else
(SB parts quality, etc.)?

I will try tonight with a patch cable for wired connection, but has anybody
else done similar comparison? Any opinion on this?

Thanks, as always.

Ken

Ken Anderson
2004-08-10, 12:36
OK! Well then I guess your CD player is doing some cool stuff :)

On Aug 10, 2004, at 3:34 PM, Ken Hokugo wrote:

> More explanation may be needed :-)
>
> 1. I use a stand alone DA converter in my audio system, and SB digital
> out (coax) is connected to this DAC's digital in, then analog out to
> my amplifier... The same goes for the convenstional CD trasnport.
>
> 2. For comparison, the exactly same digital cable (coax) is used
> between either SB or the CD transport and the DAC. Simply swapping
> between the two of them.
>
>
> Ken
>
>
> From: "Ken Hokugo" <khokugo (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
> Reply-To: Slim Devices Discussion <discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com>
> To: discuss (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
> Subject: [slim] Wired or Wireless?
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:04:42 -0400
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been enjoying Squeezebox ("SB") for the past few weeks and been
> impressed with its easiness and flexibility. Yesterday, for the first
> time since SB purchase, I compared the same CD between SB and my
> hi-end CD transport. The CD had been ripped via iTunes in WAV format
> with USB Plextor Premium CD-RW drive at its highest speed without
> "error correction". The PC is brand-new Dell 8400. SB is wireless.
> Signal strength is between 50 to 60% (PC is in the next room). The CD
> is brand new classical piano solo.
>
> Long story short, to my ears, using CD transport sounds more open,
> dynamic and detailed. Scoreing the hi-end CD transport at 10, SB
> sound is, like, 8. Not surprising (well, sort of...), but is this
> because (1) wireless signal is not strong enough? (2) ripping speed
> is too fast? or (3) something else (SB parts quality, etc.)?
>
> I will try tonight with a patch cable for wired connection, but has
> anybody else done similar comparison? Any opinion on this?
>
> Thanks, as always.
>
> Ken
>
>
>

ron thigpen
2004-08-10, 12:45
Ken Hokugo wrote:

> 1. I use a stand alone DA converter in my audio system, and SB digital
> out (coax) is connected to this DAC's digital in, then analog out to my
> amplifier

Are you using the fixed or variable digital volume setting from the SB?
Fixed is indicated for audiophile use.

--rt