FF/Rew is definitely screwy (5.0.1 W2K). I find that holding the FF button gets me into 2x mode, but then on the subsequent press, it doesn't step to 4x like it used to. Instead, I have to hold the button down again, then the speed steps to 4x, but the song position (as displayed on the bar-graph) will immediately shoot to somewhere near the end of the track.
--Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dean blackketter [mailto:dean (AT) slimdevices (DOT) com]
> Sent: Thursday 4 December 2003 04:45
> To: SlimDevices Discussion
> Subject: [slim] Fast forward / reverse
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> It shouldn't do that. Can you tell me exactly the button
> presses you are doing to make this happen?
>
> -dean
>
> On Dec 3, 2003, at 4:50 PM, Ian Crockford wrote:
>
> > Does anyone else suffer from less-than-useful fast forward
> / reverse
> > since 5.0.0? I'm finding that although the music skips along more
> > smoothly than it did under 4.x.x during fast forward, when normal
> > speed is resumed the track jumps forward by a massive amount,
> > sometimes past the end of the current track and on to the
> next one. I
> > like the improved smoothness whilst scanning the music, but not so
> > keen on the "lucky-dip" afterwards.
> >
> > Generally, though, I like "SlimServer", so good work guys!
> >
--Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dean blackketter [mailto:dean (AT) slimdevices (DOT) com]
> Sent: Thursday 4 December 2003 04:45
> To: SlimDevices Discussion
> Subject: [slim] Fast forward / reverse
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> It shouldn't do that. Can you tell me exactly the button
> presses you are doing to make this happen?
>
> -dean
>
> On Dec 3, 2003, at 4:50 PM, Ian Crockford wrote:
>
> > Does anyone else suffer from less-than-useful fast forward
> / reverse
> > since 5.0.0? I'm finding that although the music skips along more
> > smoothly than it did under 4.x.x during fast forward, when normal
> > speed is resumed the track jumps forward by a massive amount,
> > sometimes past the end of the current track and on to the
> next one. I
> > like the improved smoothness whilst scanning the music, but not so
> > keen on the "lucky-dip" afterwards.
> >
> > Generally, though, I like "SlimServer", so good work guys!
> >
Comment