Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: coax vs toslink

  1. #31
    Senior Member ralphpnj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northern NJ, USA
    Posts
    1,723
    Quote Originally Posted by trott3r View Post
    But with a bit of googling consumers are realising that they can get a 24bit
    96khz high res rip from vinyl that hasn't been butchered by the loudness
    wars. Thus the monopoly falls (at least for older music).

    Martin
    Luckily I still have most of my old (and some new) vinyl and a very good vinyl front end. Nowhere near as handy as good hi-rez digital versions (whatever their source - vinyl rip or studio master) but vinyl can often sound very good indeed.
    Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub
    Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
    Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub
    Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
    Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
    Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
    Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
    Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos
    Last.fm

  2. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by ralphpnj View Post
    Luckily I still have most of my old (and some new) vinyl and a very good vinyl front end. Nowhere near as handy as good hi-rez digital versions (whatever their source - vinyl rip or studio master) but vinyl can often sound very good indeed.
    My buddy who turned me onto Squeezebox and has downloaded a lot of music generally thinks the Vinyl rips to high res from someone with a very high end system sound the best. I guess the dynamic range issues can explain much of that preference.

  3. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6

    coax vs toslink

    Lo,

    At 00:35 31/07/2012, you wrote:

    >trott3r wrote:
    > > But with a bit of googling consumers are realising that they can get a
    > > 24bit
    > > 96khz high res rip from vinyl that hasn't been butchered by the
    > > loudness
    > > wars. Thus the monopoly falls (at least for older music).
    > >
    > > Martin

    >
    >Luckily I still have most of my old (and some new) vinyl and a very good
    >vinyl front end. Nowhere near as handy as good hi-rez digital versions
    >(whatever their source - vinyl rip or studio master) but vinyl can often
    >sound very good indeed.



    I have a fair amount of well looked after vinyl as well.
    Also my turntable the pretty decent project perspective but only a 16bit
    44khz PCM HiMD recorder so limited to CD quality for my vinyl rips.

    But at least i avoid the loudness wars mix of a modern "remastered" CD.

    Martin

    Running MorphOS v3.1 (July 2012) on a PowerPC Powerbook, Moderator of
    MiniDisc,amithlonopen,bwfc Yahoogroups



  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by lovejoy View Post
    Technobable? Maybe to you.. To me, transmission lines studied to MEng level. And I ask you.. If it is just 0s and 1s, how do you think are they represented down the length of a piece of cable?
    !
    Then you learned alot but understood nothing. They are represented down a piece of wire as zero volts and probably 5v. It would have to be a pretty long and noisy wire for there to be any discrepency. At bit rates encountered in baseband digital audio, characteristic impedance. group delay, reflections and phase issues don't even come into it over practical lengths encountered in home audio systems.

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by lovejoy View Post
    it is an analogue carrier modulating small changes in voltages representing binary information),
    No it's not. There is not an analogue carrier. There would be no advantage whatsoever of imposing a digital signal on a carrier on 2 foot of wire. It's simply ones and noughts represented by a voltage.

    Too much reading Hi-Fi magazine articles written by art students.

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by Viventis View Post
    Wow! I am so sorry to disagree, but what I have just read sounds like a bunch of techno-babble published by the manufacturers of high end cables to attempt to justify their exorbitant prices.

    Digital is binary. Binary is a sequence of 0's and 1's. If 100 different cables transmit the exact same sequence of 0's and 1's to your DAC, I guarantee that each will sound 100% the same. There is no such thing as a flat 0, a sharp 1, a warm 0 or a harsh 1. They are nothing more than numbers that are decoded by your DAC!

    If a cable is so poorly made that it is incapable of transmitting the proper sequence, the result will be different. But that is the only variable.

    This takes me back to the question of the OP. If a toslink or spdif cable transmits the same sequence of 0's and 1's to the DAC, there will be no difference in the output.
    Spot on! I have read there are cold and hot zeros though

  7. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    16
    I won't touch the audibility of differences between optical and coax cables.

    The advantage of using a toslink is that there's no electrical connection between the source and the DAC, so there won't be any grounding issues (if the components were designed without galvanic isolation).

    Where this has come into play for me is I can connect my universal player via toslink to my DAC to watch videos without worrying about the hum from my cable feed.

    So, I just connect all my digital sources (including my TOUCH) with toslink to my DAC.

    But I also happen to prefer what I hear from the toslink I use over the coaxes I've tried.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •