Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32
  1. #11
    Junior Member billybeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    27

    Thumbs up stuff

    Sorry guys
    Asus mobo, AMD 6 core, all slots filled, 4 drives
    Win 7 Pro

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,173
    Quote Originally Posted by billybeek View Post
    Sorry guys
    Asus mobo, AMD 6 core, all slots filled, 4 drives
    Win 7 Pro
    ??? What does all your computer slots being filled have to do with optimizing use of the TOUCH in your system? I'm confused. Do keep in mind that you are NOT using the soundcard, etc. of your computer. Your computer is connected to your router (preferably via ethernet) and is running Logitech Media Server (LMS) 7.7.2. The TOUCH is connected to your router via either ethernet or WIFI, and any DAC you choose to use is connected to your TOUCH via S/PDIF or Optical (or USB if using triode's EDO app).
    Location 1: VortexBox Appliance 6TB (2.2) > LMS 7.7.2 > Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet)
    Location 2: VBA 3TB (2.2) > LMS 7.7.2 > Touch > Benchmark DAC I, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
    Office: Win7(64) > LMS 7.7.2 > SqueezePlay
    Spares: VBA 4TB, SB3, Touch (3), Radio (3), CONTROLLER
    Controllers: iPhone4S (iPeng), iPad2 (iPengHD & SqueezePad), CONTROLLER, or SqueezePlay 7.7 on Win7(64) laptop
    Ripping (FLAC) - dbpoweramp, Tagging - mp3tag, Spotify

  3. #13
    Junior Member billybeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    27

    nothing

    Quote Originally Posted by garym View Post
    ??? What does all your computer slots being filled have to do with optimizing use of the TOUCH in your system? I'm confused. Do keep in mind that you are NOT using the soundcard, etc. of your computer. Your computer is connected to your router (preferably via ethernet) and is running Logitech Media Server (LMS) 7.7.2. The TOUCH is connected to your router via either ethernet or WIFI, and any DAC you choose to use is connected to your TOUCH via S/PDIF or Optical (or USB if using triode's EDO app).
    Nothing some people wanna know what kind of system it is

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,173
    Aha. Got it.
    Location 1: VortexBox Appliance 6TB (2.2) > LMS 7.7.2 > Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet)
    Location 2: VBA 3TB (2.2) > LMS 7.7.2 > Touch > Benchmark DAC I, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
    Office: Win7(64) > LMS 7.7.2 > SqueezePlay
    Spares: VBA 4TB, SB3, Touch (3), Radio (3), CONTROLLER
    Controllers: iPhone4S (iPeng), iPad2 (iPengHD & SqueezePad), CONTROLLER, or SqueezePlay 7.7 on Win7(64) laptop
    Ripping (FLAC) - dbpoweramp, Tagging - mp3tag, Spotify

  5. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    8
    Go here, it's the best upgrade you can do for free! TT mod 3.0 is the bomb!
    http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.fr/
    Master's degree Musicology
    HD650-LaFigaro 339 (w/RCA black plate 6AS7G and Telefunken EF800)-Meridian DSP3100/DSP3100HC-561-596P-SBT w/TT 3.0 tt all mods on tt -k buffer 3200-3264.
    Other gear for fun : Meridian M2, M30, M60C,101, Sony MDRF1,MDREX700, MS Alessandro, Old Beyer, Old Senn, PS3, Sony AW10.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Soulkeeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,220
    ... say some. Others say it makes no difference. Others still say it makes the Touch sound worse. So it seems YMMV.

  7. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    8
    It's pretty weird but in my simple DAC headphone amp and headphones, the improvement is better definition, the sound before is veiled and blured in comparaison. It's obvious with headphones and a good amp.
    It is also logical that if you kill all the polluting thread inside the SBT it will sound better. It is not logical in the contrary to believe leaving all those CPU consuming useless threads that it will sound "better".
    Your opinion may vary.
    Master's degree Musicology
    HD650-LaFigaro 339 (w/RCA black plate 6AS7G and Telefunken EF800)-Meridian DSP3100/DSP3100HC-561-596P-SBT w/TT 3.0 tt all mods on tt -k buffer 3200-3264.
    Other gear for fun : Meridian M2, M30, M60C,101, Sony MDRF1,MDREX700, MS Alessandro, Old Beyer, Old Senn, PS3, Sony AW10.

  8. #18
    Junior Member billybeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by edodo View Post
    It's pretty weird but in my simple DAC headphone amp and headphones, the improvement is better definition, the sound before is veiled and blured in comparaison. It's obvious with headphones and a good amp.
    It is also logical that if you kill all the polluting thread inside the SBT it will sound better. It is not logical in the contrary to believe leaving all those CPU consuming useless threads that it will sound "better".
    Your opinion may vary.
    Interesting which thread did you find polluting?

    Thanx

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulkeeper View Post
    ... say some. Others say it makes no difference. Others still say it makes the Touch sound worse. So it seems YMMV.
    You forgot the fourth option -- others never bothered to give it a try. Which didn't prevent them from offering a strong opinion about TT3.0.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ont., Canada
    Posts
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by edodo View Post
    It is not logical in the contrary to believe leaving all those CPU consuming useless threads that it will sound "better". Your opinion may vary.
    It can potentially sound "better" with all the useless threads, if less variation in power supply buss noise is better. By keeping a continuous CPU loading, rather than having it vary, this might sound better to you. Depends what those "useless" threads are actually doing too. Also in EDO, as an option, there is a means to keep the CPU loading continuous/stable and thus prevent the CPU from slipping into its low-power mode when lightly loaded, which also might sound better to you.

    Really too many possibilities to guess, best to just try it and write it off if you find no worthwhile diff. Not a lot of rules with this stuff...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •