Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 65
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    661
    >>real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it enrages them..<<

    Okay, pski, I've finally decided to take issue with this. Mostly I agree with your posts, we're on the same wavelength.

    But do you really think that volume is the sine qua non of quality audio? Or that enraging the neighbours can EVER be considered a "good thing"? I think not.

    Cute phrase, but totally at odds with almost everything else you've said.

    R.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    307
    .. surely a really good stereo should entertain the neighbours and have them knocking on your door asking you to turn it up ..!

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Watford, UK
    Posts
    1,601
    Quote Originally Posted by JezA View Post
    .. surely a really good stereo should entertain the neighbours and have them knocking on your door asking you to turn it up ..!
    Quite so.

    Many years ago it was a lovely summer Sunday afternoon. I had the windows open and happened to play Beethoven's 6th Symphony, at a fairly decent volume. When it finished, applause came from next door's back garden.
    Transporter -> ATC SCM100A

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    172

    Blatantly Brutal Thread Hijack Attempt

    Am I the only one more interested in the ability to play multichannel FLAC than in high bitrates? Granted, the two more or less go hand in hand.

    It would rock my world if the next generation player had HDMI output through which I could play FLACs copied from DVD-A. And, while I'm dreaming, would respect the channel mapping tag so 4.0 and 4.1 material would output properly.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Mnyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Västerås Sweden
    Posts
    11,673

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by atrocity View Post
    Am I the only one more interested in the ability to play multichannel FLAC than in high bitrates? Granted, the two more or less go hand in hand.

    It would rock my world if the next generation player had HDMI output through which I could play FLACs copied from DVD-A. And, while I'm dreaming, would respect the channel mapping tag so 4.0 and 4.1 material would output properly.
    I would like this to 6 ch sound is by far the most underestimed feature of DVDA everybody raves about 24/192 stereo ? A properly done 5.1 24/96 from for example AIX would blow this away or heck a 5 ch 16/44.1 too you can do so much moore with soundstage and spatial cues with more channels, and hey it's not a gimmick when done well it's very imersive.

    The luddites prefered mono over stereo in the beginging too. Keen at shooting the messenger, stereo where gimmicky in the early days so they had a piont just like multi channel gimmics can be overused today. But there is nothing wrong with the aproach one could argue that acoustically 2 sound sources is the worst in creating acoustical interference etc use 1 or many instead.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub.
    Bedroom/Office: Boom
    Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
    Misc use: Radio (with battery)
    iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
    (in storage SB3, reciever ,controller )
    server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

    http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

  6. #26
    Robin Bowes
    Guest

    New 24bit/192kHz Squeezebox Product

    On 06/14/2011 01:50 AM, Mnyb wrote:
    > ... one could argue that acoustically 2 sound sources is the worst in
    > creating acoustical interference etc use 1 or many instead.


    You could, but you'd be wrong.

    R.
    --
    "Feed that ego and you starve the soul" - Colonel J.D. Wilkes
    http://www.theshackshakers.com/

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,464
    Native multichannel is not going to happen. Two channelness is so massively ingrained into both the server and squeezeplay that it would take a complete start from scratch rewrite to do native multichannel.

    The only way to do it with the existing system is to embed the multichannel into two channels and have a decoder outside the box split it up. You can already do this with DTS or DolbyDigital, but of course those are lossy formats. There is no reason why you can't do a lossless multichannel into two channel format, but you would need an external decoder. It certainly could be done and would have a much higher probability of happening than Logitech redesigning the Touch to do it directly.

    One possibility would be to take your multichannel input, flac encode it, then parcel it out into 2 channel 24/96. You might be able to get 4 channels of 24/96 into two with flac encoding but there is no way to get 5.1 24/96. You could do it if you went with 24/192 as the "carrier" format, but the Touch's output can't do that unless you use USB. You COULD implement a simple USB driver that took the data from the Touch decoder and shoved it out over USB, bypassing ALSA etc. The outside world device would get the data and convert it to whatever you want.

    The way the Touch has been architected this would not be too hard, it would take a replacement for the jive_alsa process which can easily be added to the Touch. You would have to modify the player capabilities file on the server so it will allow 24/192 files to be sent as is.

    Of course there are no standards for any of this so one would have to be devised and then software and hardware written to support it.

    It COULD work but would take a lot of effort and would probably need some very enthusiastic group of people to push it through and probably provide the funds to implement things.

    Any of you that want this so much willing to take it on?

    John S.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    244

    Smile not what I have heard...

    Quote Originally Posted by adamdea View Post
    There are people out there who say that the improvement from 96 to 192
    exceeds that from 44 to 96: It's the final step where veils are lifted, music takes on an analogue-like ease and flow etc.
    I am not really sure that there is any need to go over 44 kHz (take a look over on hydrogen audio if you dare). I'm not even sure that there exists any program material which has information recorded in the frequency range 96-192. There seem to be frequent exposees of the shortage of over 44kHz program material
    Why stop at 192kHz- why not 384 (which some DACs can handle).
    I havent really heard this big outcry for the higher resolutions. I'm still getting more out of 16/44.1. The last chapter has not bet written for redbook. I'm not saying that PCM should be played "as is" off the disk. Much to the contrary. With that said, the solution is not going to higher and higher resolutions. I'm with the reasonable camp that looks more at the numbers and keeps things within sane expectations.
    System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter, HSU sub 12, MSB DAC to modified 300watt class d amp, JPS labs power cords, Silver audio interconnect, Audioquest Granite speaker cable.

  9. #29
    Senior Member Mnyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Västerås Sweden
    Posts
    11,673
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnSwenson View Post
    Native multichannel is not going to happen. Two channelness is so massively ingrained into both the server and squeezeplay that it would take a complete start from scratch rewrite to do native multichannel.

    The only way to do it with the existing system is to embed the multichannel into two channels and have a decoder outside the box split it up. You can already do this with DTS or DolbyDigital, but of course those are lossy formats. There is no reason why you can't do a lossless multichannel into two channel format, but you would need an external decoder. It certainly could be done and would have a much higher probability of happening than Logitech redesigning the Touch to do it directly.

    One possibility would be to take your multichannel input, flac encode it, then parcel it out into 2 channel 24/96. You might be able to get 4 channels of 24/96 into two with flac encoding but there is no way to get 5.1 24/96. You could do it if you went with 24/192 as the "carrier" format, but the Touch's output can't do that unless you use USB. You COULD implement a simple USB driver that took the data from the Touch decoder and shoved it out over USB, bypassing ALSA etc. The outside world device would get the data
    and convert it to whatever you want.

    The way the Touch has been architected this would not be too hard, it would take a replacement for the jive_alsa process which can easily be added to the Touch. You would have to modify the player capabilities file on the server so it will allow 24/192 files to be sent as is.

    Of course there are no standards for any of this so one would have to be devised and then software and hardware written to support it.

    It COULD work but would take a lot of effort and would probably need some very enthusiastic group of
    people to push it through and probably provide the funds to implement things.

    Any of you that want this so much willing to take it on?

    John S.
    I see the problems, wonder if logitech ever is going to develop a squeezebox with hdmi then you have a standard interface that takes multichannel pcm ,8ch as the standard is now.
    Your idea needs some purpose built converter recieving multichannel pcm over usb ?

    if you have a htpc with hdmi you can probably play these files. It seems easier to build one of thoose.

    but the bigger problem is the lack off content, most vendors like linn and HD- tracks does not have such files, you get them by ripping your own DVD-A and the odd old quad master leaked to the internet.
    Itrax sells 5.1 pcm hirez but itrax AIX does not release much these days ?

    So it's a great missed opurtunity not even audiophiles wants it , they are happy to buy 40 year old analog masters as 24/192khz 2ch
    Last edited by Mnyb; 2011-06-14 at 21:25.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub.
    Bedroom/Office: Boom
    Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
    Misc use: Radio (with battery)
    iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad
    (in storage SB3, reciever ,controller )
    server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux

    http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by cliveb View Post
    Quite so.

    Many years ago it was a lovely summer Sunday afternoon. I had the windows open and happened to play Beethoven's 6th Symphony, at a fairly decent volume. When it finished, applause came from next door's back garden.
    Must be the 100As - my upstairs neighbour says he relaxes listening to mine also - although maybe it's Beethoven - I love the 6th and play it a lot.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •