On Sat, 19 Jun, SuperQ wrote:
> Just so you know, there is no reason to disable 11g on equipment that
> supports 11n. There is no performance issue with having both. 11b ->
> 11g changed the RF modulation, but 11g -> 11n basically didn't. 11n
> is a superset of features (mostly 5.8ghz and channel bonding) and can
> interoperate fine with 11g devices.
This is not true per se, but very much depends on the router used. Just
google for "g devices on n network" to find explanations and examples.
--
Stefan Bellon
Results 11 to 12 of 12
Thread: 802.11n support
-
2010-06-20, 05:36 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 157
802.11n support
-
2010-06-20, 06:23 #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Glasgow, Scotland
- Posts
- 29
Using that search string brings up some interesting results. Popular opinion recommends running both a 5GHz 802.11n network alongside a 2.4GHz 802.11b/g/n network.
With my own setup I have a Acer Revo 3610 running at 54Mbit/s and my MacBook Pro shows it is connecting at 144Mbit/s. With these results it does appear that both can exist on the same 802.11g/n connection and make use of different speeds to match the inbuilt network card.

Reply With Quote

