I'm seeing siilar problems under 5.1.5 on Win2K and am not synchronizing. I'm running a large, shuffled list (~5.8K songs) and the memory seems to drop off, the creep up past the last mark at each song switch. Went from ~58MB to 128MB overnight, but wasn't playing during that time....

FWIW,
-bill

-----Original Message-----
From: developers-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com
[mailto:developers-bounces (AT) lists (DOT) slimdevices.com]On Behalf Of dean
blackketter
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:59 AM
To: Slim Devices Developers
Subject: Re: [Developers] Re: [slim] Slimserver Memory Leaks on Linux


Kevin Pearsall saw this on his Windows machine last night, his theory
is that it's related to syncronization. Are you running synced
players?

On Apr 28, 2004, at 8:38 AM, Victor Brilon wrote:

> Interesting. I am running the latest nightly with > 80GB of a music
> library. Here's my stats:
>
> # ps auwx|grep slim|grep -v grep
> slimser 32024 0.2 3.7 44136 39012 ? S Apr23 15:56
> slimserver
> slimser 32027 0.0 0.0 1460 408 ? S Apr23 0:00
> /usr/local/slimserver/Bin/i386-linux-thread-multi/mDNSResponderPosix
> -n SlimServer -t _http._tcp -p 9000
> slimser 32028 0.0 0.0 1460 408 ? S Apr23 0:00
> /usr/local/slimserver/Bin/i386-linux-thread-multi/mDNSResponderPosix
> -n SlimServer -t _slimdevices_slimserver_http._tcp -p 9000
> slimser 32029 0.0 0.0 1460 408 ? S Apr23 0:00
> /usr/local/slimserver/Bin/i386-linux-thread-multi/mDNSResponderPosix
> -n SlimServer -t slimdevices_slimserver_cli._tcp -p 9090
>
> So it's not even close in size. Can't explain the difference, just
> wanted to provide a data point.
>
> Victor
>
>
> Healy wrote:
>> I second that observation. I'm running 5.5.1 and just checked my
>> memory
>> use after 18 hours of being up has more than tripled from 80mb to over
>> 325mb:
>> This Morning, after 18 hours:
>> 8135 root 14 0 325m 320m 1732 S 0.0 36.3 18:09.83
>> slimserver.pl After Restarting:
>> 26182 root 14 0 82828 80m 1684 R 91.0 9.2 0:04.52
>> slimserver.pl On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 07:55,
>> Andrew W. Donoho wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> With both slimserver-5.1.5-1 and slimserver-2004_04_26-1, the
>>> serveron
>>> Linux appears to grow after sustained use. I have restarted it whenit
>>> grows to about 3 times its quiescent post scan startup size (in
>>> mycase
>>> 30 MB to over 100 MB). This appears to be repeatable. Any adviceon
>>> what I can do to help the community track this down?
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> ____________________________________
>>> Andrew W. Donoho
>>> awd (AT) DDG (DOT) com, PGP Key ID: 0x81D0F250
>>> +1 (512) 453-6652 (o), +1 (512) 750-7596 (m)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>