Just got my Beatles USB stick. Anyone done ABX testing of 24 bit FLAC vs CD?
I'm thinking of upsampling a track from remastered 16-bit CD to 24-bits and doing some ABXing myself, any Beatle audiophile can recommend which track is considered of high enough quality that 24 bits can make a difference???
Results 1 to 10 of 145
Thread: Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...
-
2009-12-20, 11:59 #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 466
Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...
-
2009-12-20, 13:04 #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 752
None.
I doubt any of the originals was recorded with more dynamic range a 16bit version can offer even after remastering.
If i read correctly i even wonder why they offer 24/44.1. I doubt they did the remastering at 44.1kHz so they had already processed it inbetween again.
Of cause they may have treated the master to 24/44.1 different as the master to 16/44.1Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
-
2009-12-20, 19:27 #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 752
There comes me one thing to mind. Mr. Phil Leigh has some interesting findings with throwing everything into an Audio Diffmaker.
It should be easy to compare 2 files. It also should show what version is louder by nature and may sound different alone due to that.Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
-
2009-12-20, 23:18 #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, England
- Posts
- 9,983
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.
-
2009-12-21, 00:23 #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, England
- Posts
- 9,983
OK, so I diffed the 24 and 16 bit versions of Come Together.
First observation: these come from the same digital master. There is zero sample rate difference between them (ie the samples all line up perfectly - not possible if they were from different masters).
Second observation: the overall null is -82dB (so in 16-bit terms the difference is in the bottom 3 bits). The difference file sounds silent until you give it 50dB of boost - then you can hear broadband noise (hiss) plus the basics of the music itself - you can follow the words!. Interestingly the hi-hats are very clear...
Looking at the diff file frequency plot, the differences are all below 500Hz or above 15kHz. In between there is little difference.
Conclusion: the files are very similar but still different. The differences should be audible on good equipment. The differences should manifest themselves at the top end (hi-hats) and possibly in the bass guitar/drums.
The 24-bit masters are worth having - certainly Abbey Road is.You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.
-
2009-12-21, 01:26 #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Watford, UK
- Posts
- 1,602
-
2009-12-21, 01:36 #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, England
- Posts
- 9,983
Clive - entirely possible - however that means the 24-bit versions are more "accurate"...
In fact looking again at the frequency plots I am certain you are correct.
The 24-bit versions have (literally) more music and less noise in them. But we are talking about tiny things here.Last edited by Phil Leigh; 2009-12-21 at 01:48.
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.
-
2009-12-21, 02:07 #8Louis
Last.fm
-
2009-12-21, 03:57 #9Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 1
24 bit output
Hi,
I've recently bought this too and want to check whether I'm actually listening to it at 24/44.1.
I'm playing the FLAC files via the the optical output from my Squeezebox Classic attached to my Denon AVR-3805. Will the optical output send 24bit to the amp?
Thanks,
Will
-
2009-12-21, 05:13 #10Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, England
- Posts
- 9,983
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.

Reply With Quote

