Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
  1. #11
    A quick and dirty way to remove this nagginess without retagging all your mp3s, is in the squeezecenter settings, on the Music Library tab, set "Treat multi-disc sets as single album" under the Group Discs category.

    If they're all single albums, it'll get rid of the "Disc 1" after everything.

    You may need to clear/rescan your library, not sure.

  2. #12
    Watcher of the Windows build
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Leigh View Post
    (oh and make sure the album title is the same across ALL tracks in all disks) and it works perfectly.
    This becomes a little bit of an issue, in my case, because I can not have two folders with the same name (Album Title) under the same (Artist) folder. e.g

    Artist Name (folder)
    Album Name1 (Sub-folder with the content of CD 1)
    Album Name1 (Sub-folder with the content of CD 2)

    This is illegal under most file systems naming conventions. You can not have two separated sub-folders with the same name off the same folder. In my case, when I rip a CD I use the Artist Name Tag to create the main folder and the Album Name Tag to create the corresponding sub-folders with the corresponding Album name. This is the reason why I add CDx after the name of each multi CD album for a specific artist. I have to give different names to each the sub-folders to abide by the folder/file naming convention. I have a few World Music multi-CD albums that have more than 20 tracks per CD. Merging them under a single folder is not convenient when I navigate the library using the folders.

    What is wrong with a solution that suppresses the "display" of the DISC/DISCNUMBER tag under the SC setting for the Web UI and for the Players? Again, my FLAC library is "not" used "exclusively" with SC.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nij Beets, The Netherlands
    Posts
    480
    Why can't you have two subfolders like The Wall\CD1 and The Wall\CD2? dbPowerAmp makes these folders automatically when you set the album name to the same and the disc number to 1 and 2. dbPoweramp appends (Disc 1) and (Disc 2) to the folder name, but *not* to the album tag (that one is the same for both). It looks like you (or your ripping program) are thinking that the folder name must be the same as the tag album.

    Teus

  4. #14
    Watcher of the Windows build
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Teus de Jong View Post
    Why can't you have two subfolders like The Wall\CD1 and The Wall\CD2? dbPowerAmp makes these folders automatically when you set the album name to the same and the disc number to 1 and 2. dbPoweramp appends (Disc 1) and (Disc 2) to the folder name, but *not* to the album tag (that one is the same for both). It looks like you (or your ripping program) are thinking that the folder name must be the same as the tag album.

    Teus
    I'm using dBpowerAmp. Using your naming scheme I would have another sub-folder level. Increasing the folder depth makes folder navigation more inconvenient and actually impossible for one of my players to use as it only supports two levels of sub-folders off the root.

    This is how The Wall would look using your approach


    Root of the library folder
    ROCK (Genre folder)
    Pink Floyd (Artist Name sub-folder)
    The Wall (Album Name sub-folder) <--- Extra level to accommodate multi CD albums
    -->CD1 (Tracks sub-folder for CD1)
    -->CD2 (Tracks sub-folder for CD2)
    Wish You Were Here (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)

    Below is how it would look in my set up. Also keep in mind that I have already ripped almost a thousand CDs. Changing the folder structure would be a pain. Easily solved if one could "optionally" suppress the (Disc x of x) from being appended (displayed) at the end of each Album Name.

    Root of the library folder
    ROCK (Genre folder)
    Pink Floyd (Artist Name sub-folder)
    The Wall - CD1 (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)
    The Wall - CD2 (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)
    Wish You Were Here (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)

  5. #15
    Banned MrSinatra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    3,696
    i do it like you, and think thats the best way, but some people actually treat multi cd albums as ONE FOLDER, so that both cds go into one folder, and that folder is simply the album name.

    thats not for me, but there's lots of ways to do it.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Buckinghamshire, England
    Posts
    9,983
    Quote Originally Posted by tamanaco View Post
    This becomes a little bit of an issue, in my case, because I can not have two folders with the same name (Album Title) under the same (Artist) folder. e.g

    Artist Name (folder)
    Album Name1 (Sub-folder with the content of CD 1)
    Album Name1 (Sub-folder with the content of CD 2)

    This is illegal under most file systems naming conventions. You can not have two separated sub-folders with the same name off the same folder. In my case, when I rip a CD I use the Artist Name Tag to create the main folder and the Album Name Tag to create the corresponding sub-folders with the corresponding Album name. This is the reason why I add CDx after the name of each multi CD album for a specific artist. I have to give different names to each the sub-folders to abide by the folder/file naming convention. I have a few World Music multi-CD albums that have more than 20 tracks per CD. Merging them under a single folder is not convenient when I navigate the library using the folders.

    What is wrong with a solution that suppresses the "display" of the DISC/DISCNUMBER tag under the SC setting for the Web UI and for the Players? Again, my FLAC library is "not" used "exclusively" with SC.
    That wasn't what I meant. The folder names are different, but the ALBUM tags across all tracks in a set are the same.
    You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
    Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
    Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
    Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nij Beets, The Netherlands
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by tamanaco View Post
    ... Below is how it would look in my set up. Also keep in mind that I have already ripped almost a thousand CDs. Changing the folder structure would be a pain. Easily solved if one could "optionally" suppress the (Disc x of x) from being appended (displayed) at the end of each Album Name.

    Root of the library folder
    ROCK (Genre folder)
    Pink Floyd (Artist Name sub-folder)
    The Wall - CD1 (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)
    The Wall - CD2 (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)
    Wish You Were Here (Album Name - Tracks sub-folder)
    Nothing against such a folder structure (a lot of my multi-disc sets have exactly this structure -- others have the one I earlier mentioned). As Phil says: just make sure the Album *tag* is the same in all files in both folders and all works well.

    Teus

  8. #18
    Banned MrSinatra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    3,696
    the thing is a lot of people don't want to browse 50 tracks made of two cds sharing the exact same album name tag.

    does assigning differing disc numbers split the one album into two separate parts for browsing?

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nij Beets, The Netherlands
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSinatra View Post
    does assigning differing disc numbers split the one album into two separate parts for browsing?
    When browsing by folder, yes; when browsing by artist (tags), no. In the last case you have one list, where each track (depending on the display settings chosen of course) is preceded by 1-1, 1-2, ..., 2-1, 2-2, etc. If you don't want it this way, why setting 'Treat multi-disc sets as one album'?


    @tamanaco:
    I just looked at what dbPowerAmp does by default (you can adjust this) and it is exactly what you want. Here is a part of the folder structure of Pink Floyd on my disc (leaving off the drive part):

    ...
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Final Cut
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Piper at the Gates of Dawn
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Wall Disc 1
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Wall Disc 2
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\Ummagumma Disc 1
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\Ummagumma Disc 2
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\Wish you were here

    Teus

  10. #20
    Watcher of the Windows build
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Teus de Jong View Post


    @tamanaco:
    I just looked at what dbPowerAmp does by default (you can adjust this) and it is exactly what you want. Here is a part of the folder structure of Pink Floyd on my disc (leaving off the drive part):

    ...
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Final Cut
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Piper at the Gates of Dawn
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Wall Disc 1
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\The Wall Disc 2
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\Ummagumma Disc 1
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\Ummagumma Disc 2
    Music\P\Pink Floyd\Wish you were here

    Teus
    Exactly what setting did you adjust to append the Disc x to the end of the Album Folder name as you rip a multi-CD Album? Do you also use the DISC tag and if so, doesn't SC add (Disc x of x) when displaying the album name? In other words, if the DISC tag is set to x/x does SC display the Album Name as The Wall Disc 1 (Disk 1 of 2). Btw, I use the DISC tag when I search for tracks using interfaces other than SC. My understanding is that dBpowerAmp uses the DISC tag which is then mapped to the DISCNUMBER tag in SC. Also note that in dBpowerAmp I use the "Album Artist" tag to create the Artist folders to accommodate Album compilations made up of various artists which some times are made up of multiple CDs. See example below.

    LATIN (Genre folder)
    A Night in Havana - Various Artists (Folder created using the "Album Artist" Tag)
    A Night In Havana - CD1 (Folder created using the "Album" tag - All tracks within the folder use the "Artist" tag to identify each individual artist and the "Disc" tag to facilitate searches using tags)
    A Night In Havana - CD2 (Folder created using the "Album" tag - All tracks within the folder use the "Artist" tag to identify each individual artist and the "Disc" tag to facilitate searches using tags)

    Using the folder structure above makes it easy for me to navigate albums using folders when the interface does not support tags. I have no functional problems with interfaces that use tags to naviagate and search my libraries using my existing folder and tag scheme. I only have a "cosmetic" issue with SC because it adds the (Disc x of x) to the end of the Album Names when displaying in the Now Playing screen of my SB3 and when viewing the library using the SC Web UI or any interface that uses the SC engine. Again, all I want is a SC option to hide the (Disc x of x) when the DISC/DISCNUMBER tag is present.
    Last edited by tamanaco; 2009-04-08 at 05:30.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •