Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 93
  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Kirkland, WA USA
    Posts
    262
    I just did this and the web UI is much snappier.

    I don't have a huge collection so I don't know if I'll see a big difference in scanning.

    Thanks moonbase!
    -Gordon

    Squeezebox Server 7.53 + HP MediaSmart EX485
    Duet/3 Receivers
    Squeezeplay on all PCs

  2. #52
    Banned MrSinatra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    3,696
    any chance on this becoming an extension plugin?

  3. #53
    Senior Member gharris999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    3,299
    Haven't some of these tweaks to my.tt already made it into 7.4 as the 'stock' configuration? I thought I was seeing a difference between 7.3.4's my.tt and 7.4's.

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    10,073
    Quote Originally Posted by gharris999 View Post
    Haven't some of these tweaks to my.tt already made it into 7.4 as the 'stock' configuration? I thought I was seeing a difference between 7.3.4's my.tt and 7.4's.
    Well that's incredibly easy to test. Let me look...

  5. #55
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    10,073
    The my.tt in 7.5 is the same as that of 7.4, while my.tt in 7.3 has a comment line that differs (the old server name) and the one from 7.2 is missing the tmpdir directive of later versions. Otherwise, all other configuration options are identical.

  6. #56
    Senior Member gharris999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    3,299
    Well, if you guys are confident that these changes work well with most hardware and don't introduce any instability, why not open an enhancement bug request? Writing a plugin to give users a gui for tweaking my.tt options seems a little like overkill to me. But a test script that would start & stop mysql with different 'tunings' and run timed test queries so as to affirm the efficacy of various options...now that I would like to see.

  7. #57
    Banned MrSinatra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    3,696
    its not overkill at all. many people like a gui b/c they don't feel confident messing around in the files, i know i don't. also a gui shows what "range" settings can be, allows for easy and quick changes to test different settings, and allows for some helpful explanatory text to give users pointers on what might work best on their kind of setup. (also allows "return to default")

    besides, this kind of "tweaking" plugin could be extended to other tweaks in the future, not just moonbases excellent work here. i think its high time for an "under the hood" tweaking gui plugin.

  8. #58
    Senior Member Philip Meyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,568

    Dramatic speedup: Give database some room tobreathe

    >its not overkill at all. many people like a gui b/c they don't feel
    >confident messing around in the files, i know i don't. also a gui shows
    >what "range" settings can be, allows for easy and quick changes to test
    >different settings, and allows for some helpful explanatory text to give
    >users pointers on what might work best on their kind of setup. (also
    >allows "return to default")


    No, it would be overkill. People who feel they need to tweak the database for extra speed should be aware of what they are doing. A GUI would allow too many people to tweak things that the ought not be touching.


  9. #59
    Banned MrSinatra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    3,696
    nonsense. you could say that about a TON of things already in SBS and the plugins. and besides, the plugin could clearly document things and make changes reversable.

    too little faith is shown here in users, logitech suffers from "we know whats best" too much, and need to get over it. these are very substantial performance gains that should be put into easy configurable reach for those who look for it. big reward, little risk.

    besides, i'm not advocating the plugin come with SBS by default, altho i'd have no beef with that, but it could be downloaded or what not. some other current plugins and abilities are in my opinon, far more complex to initiate and maintain then this would be.

  10. #60
    Senior Member Philip Meyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,568

    Dramatic speedup: Give database some room tobreathe

    >nonsense. you could say that about a TON of things already in SBS and
    >the plugins.
    >

    I can't think of any that modify the configuration of things that are outside the remits of the SbS software. Making such edits could potentially render the DB inoperable.

    >too little faith is shown here in users, logitech suffers from "we know
    >whats best" too much, and need to get over it.
    >

    It's dangerous to offer this to your average user via a plugin.

    >these are very substantial performance gains that should be put into easy configurable
    >reach for those who look for it. big reward, little risk.
    >

    Why should users need to configure the database? The DB could be auto-tuned at installation by the installer.

    If users really want to optimise the DB further, they probably know what they are doing, or a tech-savvy enough to follow instructions to edit a text file.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •