Results 21 to 30 of 101
Thread: Deezer
-
2008-12-09, 07:27 #21
-
2008-12-09, 07:42 #22
This is entirely speculation (I have no inside insight) but I can think of a large number of commercial and legal reasons why the Deezer plugin may operate like this. It's also not unusual - you can select individual, full tracks to play via the Last.fm website, but not via the official plugin.
Deezer has (after a very tortous and well documented process) negotiated rights for itself to stream on-demand full tracks from its website. It will have done this with two groups of people - the rightsholders themselves and the regulators. We have no way of knowing what is in the agreements with the rightsholders, but they may also impact on what Deezer can do with third parties, or it may require Deezer to go and get further agreements with the rightsholders every time they want to give a third party like Slim Devices access to their services (this is quite common).
As others have mentioned, there may be restrictions on SD itself based on other agreements it has with third party providers.
Also, Deezer may not want to give full functionality for commercial reasons - by offering limited, free, functionality through SD you create awareness of the service but still have the prospect of driving traffic to the Deezer site.
Or the price offered for full streaming functionality was too high for SD, so they went for a more limited model.
Finally, there are the regulatory issues - here, Europe is in a pretty sorry state compared with the US. There is no single model or regulator to deal with and each country seeks to impose its own licencing requirements. Some are easier to deal with than others (and this I do have direct knowledge of). Some countries draw a distinction between streaming via web pages and streaming via third party hardware, that may be an issue in this case.
These are just the initial thoughts that occur to me - there are probably many more. I doubt SD will comment on commercial issues - the agreements will no doubt be subject to confidentiality provisions - and I wouldn't expect them to in any event, particularly when they've just increased the functionality of the Squeezeboxes, for free, albeit to a limited group of users.
As someone who really loved Pandora until is was withdrawn from non-US users, I understand the frustration. However, if it was as easy as that to get relevant streaming worldwide streaming licences - surely everyone would be doing it?Who am I on LAST.FM?
"Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback included: yeah, it's good... got the odd dodgy track tho..." (c) ModelCitizen
-
2008-12-09, 07:45 #23Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 489
That's probably because streaming on demand requires a DRM imlpementation at the firmware side which is not trivial for the current Slim devices.
Currently the only DRM that's supported is Rhapsody's.
We've been hoping for Napster integration as well, but that requires PlaysForSure DRM support which is yet to be announced.
-
2008-12-09, 08:23 #24
Deezer does have an on-demand service as you know, but we only implemented support for the radio service in the first version. On-demand may come later.
-
2008-12-09, 09:01 #25SqbxSvr Running on MacMini Server
- 1 Transporter
- 1 Boom
- 1 Controller
http://www.last.fm/user/JackieBr/
http://www.last.fm/label/rarenoiserecords
http://www.rarenoiserecords.com
Support Mick Karn's family :
www.rarenoiserecords.com/mick-karn-benefit-page
RareNoiseRecords Jukebox :
www.rarenoiserecords.com/jukebox
-
2008-12-09, 14:14 #26Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 6
Deezer on-demand
Andy,
It's a great news for squeezebox french owners that you want in the future extend the Deezer application in this version on-demand !
I'm impatient...
Best regards.
-
2008-12-09, 15:05 #27
Great, so the API allows for this then?
That surprises me. I had assumed that this was just a hook to get people using the full fat web service, where they can be forced to look at the adverts that pay for the service. Other than intrusive audio advert breaks in the music playback (as other services are planning/trialling) i cant see how they can make any money via a platform such as this one.Cheers, auto.
Lounge: Squeezebox 3, Squeezebox Controller, Cambridge Audio 640A, Mission 701's Kitchen: Squeezebox Touch, Trends TA-10.1, Kef Cresta 1's. Bedroom: Squeezebox Boom Bathroom/Garden: Squeezebox Radio Car: iPod Classic 80GB Portable: iPhone 3GS 32Gb (+iPeng)
-
2008-12-09, 15:09 #28
Yes, and on-demand would be a premium pay service.
-
2008-12-10, 02:27 #29
Absolutely fine in my book, not trying to be a freetard...what many in the UK and EU have been asking for is a choice. I would be perfectly happy were Rhapsody to offer a "paid for" service in the UK/EU (or Napster for that matter)!
The divide "free radio vs pay for choice of individual track" is an acceptable one...
regards,
GiacomoSqbxSvr Running on MacMini Server
- 1 Transporter
- 1 Boom
- 1 Controller
http://www.last.fm/user/JackieBr/
http://www.last.fm/label/rarenoiserecords
http://www.rarenoiserecords.com
Support Mick Karn's family :
www.rarenoiserecords.com/mick-karn-benefit-page
RareNoiseRecords Jukebox :
www.rarenoiserecords.com/jukebox
-
2008-12-10, 14:29 #30Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- The Built, the Netherlands
- Posts
- 116


Reply With Quote

