Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7

    Receiver without Controller

    Hello,
    I'm very interested in buying a Squeezebox Duet, but... I can't afford it! I could afford a Receiver and I'm ready to control it from the PC and do without the remote.
    However the specs read:
    System requirements:
    * Squeezbox Controller required for network setup


    I've been told that this requirement would disappear with SqueezeCenter 7.3 eg. that I could set up the Receiver without the Controller. But I don't see this info in the roadmap of SqueezeCenter.

    Are there any plans to make the Receiver completely independant from the Controller?

    Thank you.

  2. #2

    Controller

    You need the wireless music player not the receiver/controller - it is confusing.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by dgovan View Post
    You need the wireless music player not the receiver/controller - it is confusing.
    Do you mean that the Duet can't be used without a Classic or a Boom?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    7,099
    No, what he means is the Squeezebox Receiver (SBR) can't be used without the Squeezebox Controller (SBC).

    I'm not sure where you saw that this requirement is eliminated for 7.3. There is a beta command-line tool that allows you to set up an SBR without an SBC, but it's beta and it's unsupported. Whether this tool will be incorporated into 7.3, I don't know.
    Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta, PQP1 - early beta), SBC (early beta), Squeezebox Radio (PB1 - early beta), Squeezebox Touch (late beta)
    Sold: SB3, Duet

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Lanctot View Post
    No, what he means is the Squeezebox Receiver (SBR) can't be used without the Squeezebox Controller (SBC).

    I'm not sure where you saw that this requirement is eliminated for 7.3. There is a beta command-line tool that allows you to set up an SBR without an SBC, but it's beta and it's unsupported. Whether this tool will be incorporated into 7.3, I don't know.
    Thank you.

    It was hinted at in a French forum dedicated to various hardware.
    I'll look into the unsupported beta cli tool.

    SC7.3: it could make sense, commercially, for Logitech not to push such a tool out of "GeekWorld". As far as I'm concerned, it'll either be $150 in the pocket of Logitech for the Receiver, or €80 in the pocket of One-For-All for an 'alternative'.
    Last edited by aLieNSHiPS; 2008-10-17 at 11:12.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    7,099
    Quote Originally Posted by aLieNSHiPS View Post
    I'll look into the unsupported beta cli tool.
    I think it's called "NET-UDAP".

    You can also look at the Squeezebox Classic. It's more expensive than the SBR but less expensive than the Duet combo (SBR + SBC).
    Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta, PQP1 - early beta), SBC (early beta), Squeezebox Radio (PB1 - early beta), Squeezebox Touch (late beta)
    Sold: SB3, Duet

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Lanctot View Post
    I think it's called "NET-UDAP".
    yes:
    http://projects.robinbowes.com/Net-UDAP/trac

    Other links that might be useful:
    http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth...uration&page=3
    http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43722
    http://www.tux.org/~peterw/slim/PowerCenter.html

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Lanctot View Post
    You can also look at the Squeezebox Classic. It's more expensive than the SBR but less expensive than the Duet combo (SBR + SBC).
    I'd like to, but the receiver itself is already a bit above my budget. I might extend it later when I have more cash available and/or move to a bigger place.

    The Squeezebox line seems great (good audio, good networking, good ergonomy, good FLAC support, open source SC with a community, lots of goodies), its only -but big- drawback is that it's not possible to 'bypass' it ie use foobar/mpd/whatever instead. Any software, as good as it is, has limitations. And I'm not a programmer!

    Anyway, very tempting!
    Last edited by aLieNSHiPS; 2008-10-17 at 11:53.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •