Hi,
as many other in this forum I got the problem that the webinterface of the SqueezeCenter since version 7.x is incredebly slow. Simply accessing the index page takes more than 5 minutes!!!
Actually the basic page is build up quite fast (at least compared to the overall time) but loading the icons for the different options/plugins in the left side menu takes ages. To see what actually takes that much time I locked onto my ReadNAS via SSH and ran top after my browser already loaded the plalist and the menu structure and "only" the icons remained to be loaded. I was very surprised to see the slimserver-s process was taking 90+% of the cpu time although it wasn't doing "anything" apart from transferring maybe 100Kb in total for the icons.
I think there should be much space for performance tuning in this area, or is there anything I missed SqueezeCenter needs to do to while transfering the menu icons.
Is there perhaps already any tuning planed regarding this problem??
Best regards
P.S.: I really love the combination ReadyNAS + SqueezeBox
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
2008-09-04, 02:45 #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 5
SqueezeCenter 7.x webinterface (ReadyNAS NV+ 1GB RAM)
-
2008-09-04, 03:09 #2
SqueezeCenter 7.xwebinterface (ReadyNAS NV+ 1GB RAM)
> as many other in this forum I got the problem that the webinterface of
> the SqueezeCenter since version 7.x is incredebly slow. Simply
> accessing the index page takes more than 5 minutes!!!
?!?? While it can take half a minute, it should not spend minutes doing so. Did the initial scan finish?
> Actually the basic page is build up quite fast (at least compared to
> the overall time) but loading the icons for the different
> options/plugins in the left side menu takes ages.
Please make sure you've set Artwork Resampling to use the faster Resize algorithm. The 5 minutes spent to render the images are typical for the slower Resampling algorithm on the ReadyNAS. In fact that option was introduced solely because of the ReadyNAS...
> Is there perhaps already any tuning planed regarding this problem??
Yes, we're actively working on improving performance on low-power machines. Make sure you're running the latest 7.2 builds - nightly 7.2.1 might even be a tiny wee bit faster than 7.2.0. Will save you a few seconds every day :-)
--
Michael
-
2008-09-05, 02:42 #3Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 5
Great improvement with SqueezeCenter 7.2
I actually have to revise my previous post to some point. Yesterday I installed the official version 7.2 of SqueezeCenter, rebuilt the music library and tried to access the webinterface again. I've to admit that I was very impressed by the improvement in performance. What took very look with the previous version - loading the icons in the "Home" section (not the artwork) - now is finished in a few seconds. Thus loading the iniital screen without a playlist takes 18 seconds, which I think is ok.
I actually wasn't the artwork that took so long to be loaded but those tiny icons in the home section of the screen. Like "Music Library -> Artists".
Where can I find the artwork resampling setting? I know I changed it in the previous version but I'm can't find it anymore in the current one...
It's great to hear that. I somewhere read that with version 7.3 of SqueezeCenter a complete redesign of the underlying database is planed. I'm really excited to see this version in action...
Best regards
-
2008-09-05, 02:55 #4
SqueezeCenter 7.xwebinterface (ReadyNAS NV+ 1GB RAM)
> I actually wasn't the artwork that took so long to be loaded but those
> tiny icons in the home section of the screen. Like "Music Library ->
> Artists".
They're handled the same: we only have a large copy of the file in the package, but when accessed for the first time it's scaled down and stored in the server side cache.
> Where can I find the artwork resampling setting? I know I changed it in
Settings/Advanced/Performance
--
Michael
-
2008-09-25, 11:00 #5
at a radio station i do things for, we have a readynas 1100 which we use to serve music to automation. i recently updated it to the latest fw and official 7.2 release.
hopefully soon it will be on the penn state backbone, and at that point, i plan to put a few of my own mp3 tunes on it just to see how it does. it only has 512megs of ram though. so should i upgrade it? and if so, what is the max and what memory should i use?
i will be very interested to see if the 1100 can power my SB at home, (256kbps mp3s).

Reply With Quote


