One more thing as I'm on a roll. You really need to give up on the wav thing and get dbpoweramp and go with flac only. Much better tags and you'll save a half your space. The tags are the important thing. No reason at all for wav on a computer. You can convert them all in one conversion with dbpoweramp and then as you rip you can get real accurate tags that will work great without much work on your part. Much better in the long run.
Results 11 to 20 of 34
-
2008-08-03, 22:41 #11If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use is the rule.
HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
-
2008-08-03, 22:44 #12If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use is the rule.
HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
-
2008-08-04, 05:37 #13Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 37
-
2008-08-04, 05:41 #14Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 37
I chose wav for my archive format because I don't care about storage space as I have a lot and can add as much more when I need it. Storage is not expensive. And with wav files, I can convert them to any format I want or need at the time.
Ok, the tags thing. I've never really understood the tags issue. What is a tag and what does it do for me? With my Squeezebox setup I have now, I don't see any difference with the wav files or the flac files. They both look and play the same.Last edited by cavediver; 2008-08-04 at 05:45.
-
2008-08-04, 06:53 #15
i think wavs have very limited tagging abilities compared to other formats, but i may be wrong. i'm also not sure what apps support tagging wavs.
tags are just data in a special "padded" section of the audio file that identify many things about it, ie. artist, title, album, genre, year, etc...
one other consideration about wav isn't just data storage size, but bw use. wavs require a lot of bw compared to other formats.
-
2008-08-04, 10:09 #16Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada
- Posts
- 126
You can convert FLAC to any format you want also, including back to WAV. db poweramp will handle everything for you including adding tags, artwork, replaygain, conversion to multiple formats at the same time, etc.
You're right, storage is cheap, but why use 40% to 50% more than you really need for no advantage?
What are you using to rip?
Jim
-
2008-08-04, 10:13 #17
-
2008-08-04, 10:19 #18Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 37
But, why should I care about imbedded tag data including artist, title, album, genre, year, etc.
And why should I care about bandwidth. The Squeezebox doesn't have any problems with the wav files. My network doesn't have any problems with them. I have more than enough bw to anything I want at any time. I care about high quality uncompressed audio and want my files to be as high quality and as close to the source as possible.
-
2008-08-04, 10:25 #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada
- Posts
- 126
I used EAC for years to rip, Tag and Rename to get artwork, dbpoweramp to convert to MP3, and Foobar to add replaygain( album gain) I recently switched to the current version of dbpoweramp since it does all of the above and more...very simple to use and much more convenient.
Jim
-
2008-08-04, 11:46 #20
i can't tell you why you should care, but i can tell you that i care about having the tag data b/c i have a very large collection of music and the tag data not only helps me organize it and keep track of it, (what version something is, where it came from), but it also allows me other functions such as replaygain that allow me to maintain essentially a consistent volume in a random mix without altering the actual music data.
to each his own, but i couldn't get by without tags.
as to bw, if your situation ever changes or if you ever want to share your music (to others) or even take it portably somewhere, it matters.


Reply With Quote

