Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member ezkcdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,108

    We're going to need a bigger...external PSU?

    So, the new headless receiver takes an 9V DC supply and has internal linear regulators (makes sense given the 6Vpp analog output + overhead needed for the regs). Does anyone here know what type of regulators are being used internally? I'm wondering if some preregulation is warranted. I never really bought into the need for an external PSU with the SB3 given the internal regs were switchers, but now...I've always wanted to build a Jung regulator, and this may just be the excuse I needed.
    There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't.
    ShinyMetal
    Site| RSS |Forum

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    DE
    Posts
    36
    After reading the release I thought about this as well, I currently run a hidden away SB3 (i.e. display is useless to me here) to a NOSDAC in my family room setup. Seems like this little box could have some neat mod potential for us DAC users.

  3. #3
    Founder, Slim Devices seanadams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,880
    Power supplies in the receiver are simpler because it does not have a display. The DAC is just powered by a linear reg from the input. Also the total power draw is down by a half of so.

  4. #4
    Senior Member ezkcdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,108
    Quote Originally Posted by seanadams View Post
    Power supplies in the receiver are simpler because it does not have a display. The DAC is just powered by a linear reg from the input. Also the total power draw is down by a half of so.
    Thanks for the info.
    There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't.
    ShinyMetal
    Site| RSS |Forum

  5. #5
    Senior Member opaqueice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    A place where something is or could be located; a site.
    Posts
    1,815
    Quote Originally Posted by seanadams View Post
    Power supplies in the receiver are simpler because it does not have a display. The DAC is just powered by a linear reg from the input. Also the total power draw is down by a half of so.
    Sean, since this is an audiophile forum I have to ask why the THD level is slightly (5.5dB) higher? Is that due to the Wolfson DAC? And how's the jitter?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Buckinghamshire, England
    Posts
    9,983
    Quote Originally Posted by seanadams View Post
    Power supplies in the receiver are simpler because it does not have a display. The DAC is just powered by a linear reg from the input. Also the total power draw is down by a half of so.
    aaaargh! - Sean you know that's just opened a can of PSU worms...now there is no switching reg to hide behind, all sorts of "super reg PSU's" upgrades will appear )

    (Having just upgraded the PSU in my DAC to an Invisus super-reg I feel qualified to comment...)
    You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
    Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
    Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
    Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.

  7. #7
    Founder, Slim Devices seanadams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,880
    Quote Originally Posted by opaqueice View Post
    Sean, since this is an audiophile forum I have to ask why the THD level is slightly (5.5dB) higher? Is that due to the Wolfson DAC? And how's the jitter?
    The entire digital section including s/pdif circuitry is identical to SB3, so if you want a high-end external DAC, go for it. Jitter is the same. Specs for the Receiver's DAC are good but not quite as good as SB3's. However, I think the numbers currently posted on the site are the worst-case bounds from the data sheet - we may revise them based on measurements of mass-production units, which are usually better. Of course a single THD figure is not that useful in characterizing total DAC performance. In all the listening tests we've been done it seems quite a good performer.

  8. #8
    Founder, Slim Devices seanadams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,880
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Leigh View Post
    aaaargh! - Sean you know that's just opened a can of PSU worms...now there is no switching reg to hide behind, all sorts of "super reg PSU's" upgrades will appear )

    (Having just upgraded the PSU in my DAC to an Invisus super-reg I feel qualified to comment...)
    I have not yet tried a super reg on it but it should be a good improvement. However, it would still need to be put on the DAC's power rail to be most effective.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •