So, the new headless receiver takes an 9V DC supply and has internal linear regulators (makes sense given the 6Vpp analog output + overhead needed for the regs). Does anyone here know what type of regulators are being used internally? I'm wondering if some preregulation is warranted. I never really bought into the need for an external PSU with the SB3 given the internal regs were switchers, but now...I've always wanted to build a Jung regulator, and this may just be the excuse I needed.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
2008-01-06, 08:18 #1
We're going to need a bigger...external PSU?
-
2008-01-06, 09:12 #2Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- DE
- Posts
- 36
After reading the release I thought about this as well, I currently run a hidden away SB3 (i.e. display is useless to me here) to a NOSDAC in my family room setup. Seems like this little box could have some neat mod potential for us DAC users.
-
2008-01-06, 10:12 #3
Power supplies in the receiver are simpler because it does not have a display. The DAC is just powered by a linear reg from the input. Also the total power draw is down by a half of so.
-
2008-01-06, 10:24 #4
-
2008-01-06, 10:26 #5
-
2008-01-06, 10:47 #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, England
- Posts
- 9,983
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables
Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.
-
2008-01-06, 11:14 #7
The entire digital section including s/pdif circuitry is identical to SB3, so if you want a high-end external DAC, go for it. Jitter is the same. Specs for the Receiver's DAC are good but not quite as good as SB3's. However, I think the numbers currently posted on the site are the worst-case bounds from the data sheet - we may revise them based on measurements of mass-production units, which are usually better. Of course a single THD figure is not that useful in characterizing total DAC performance. In all the listening tests we've been done it seems quite a good performer.
-
2008-01-06, 11:16 #8

Reply With Quote
)
