Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Gadfly, Former Founder Slim Devices dean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    4,427

    Busy day, let's wrap it up

    Hey Folks,

    Nice work to Dan and KDF for their excellent cleaning and fixing work,
    along with the new cover art feature.

    I'd like to wrap up development on 5.0.3 this week and get out a really
    solid new official release.

    So, to this end, please post any patches for review before they go in
    and let's keep it to bug fixes until we release.

    Thanks to all,

    dean

    p.s. I'm behind in some submitted patches from other folks. Stay
    tuned on these...

  2. #2
    Richard Purdie
    Guest

    Re: Busy day, let's wrap it up

    > I'd like to wrap up development on 5.0.3 this week and get out a really
    > solid new official release.


    Sounds good.

    > p.s. I'm behind in some submitted patches from other folks. Stay
    > tuned on these...


    Attached is a further enhancement of my patch for bug 131. It should be
    applied after my previous patch (s4.diff).

    It converts types like aiff into aif (I found the function).

    It also returns error 400 if we a) don't recognise the type or b) can't find
    a command to convert to it.

    s9.diff adds an if statement to Source.pm so any files which aren't mp3
    files and which aren't going to a squeezebox get full headers.

    There is one remaining problem which is silence.mp3. This gets streamed
    regardless of the type of stream and is going to be a pain. It should
    probably get piped though getcommand although I don't see an easy way to do
    it...

    I've tested quite throughly and wav streaming does work (if you connect to
    the stream after starting it playing to avoid silence.mp3). I get 400 errors
    when I should as well. We just need some players that support these types of
    stream now (quicktime in my browser appeared to although I didn't try track
    changeover which will be the tricky bit with these streams).

    RP

  3. #3
    Gadfly, Former Founder Slim Devices dean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    4,427

    Re: Busy day, let's wrap it up

    Richard,

    Could you post a single comprehensive patch. I'm afraid I'm going to
    miss something...


    On Jan 13, 2004, at 5:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:

    >> I'd like to wrap up development on 5.0.3 this week and get out a
    >> really
    >> solid new official release.

    >
    > Sounds good.
    >
    >> p.s. I'm behind in some submitted patches from other folks. Stay
    >> tuned on these...

    >
    > Attached is a further enhancement of my patch for bug 131. It should be
    > applied after my previous patch (s4.diff).
    >
    > It converts types like aiff into aif (I found the function).
    >
    > It also returns error 400 if we a) don't recognise the type or b)
    > can't find
    > a command to convert to it.
    >
    > s9.diff adds an if statement to Source.pm so any files which aren't mp3
    > files and which aren't going to a squeezebox get full headers.
    >
    > There is one remaining problem which is silence.mp3. This gets streamed
    > regardless of the type of stream and is going to be a pain. It should
    > probably get piped though getcommand although I don't see an easy way
    > to do
    > it...
    >
    > I've tested quite throughly and wav streaming does work (if you
    > connect to
    > the stream after starting it playing to avoid silence.mp3). I get 400
    > errors
    > when I should as well. We just need some players that support these
    > types of
    > stream now (quicktime in my browser appeared to although I didn't try
    > track
    > changeover which will be the tricky bit with these streams).
    >
    > RP
    > <s8.diff><s9.diff>

  4. #4
    Richard Purdie
    Guest

    Re: Busy day, let's wrap it up

    > Could you post a single comprehensive patch. I'm afraid I'm going to
    > miss something...


    Ok. Which ones do you want?

    I'm guessing you want:

    All patches for Bug 131
    Patch to add dirtycache flag
    Patch to remove cached entries about uncached images upon rescan.

    and not:

    The patch which adds the wipecache functionality. (although I may as well
    include the code which adds the function to Info.pm and adds it to the
    Command Line interface, just not the UI change).

    I submitted them indiviudally as I didn't know if you'd want to apply them
    all. I'm having fun with CVS now as my files are getting very out of sync
    . The original patches no longer apply cleanly...

    RP

  5. #5
    Gadfly, Former Founder Slim Devices dean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    4,427

    Re: Busy day, let's wrap it up

    I'd like all of them to look at. As long as they don't break anything,
    I'm not opposed to adding any of them, including the wipecache button.


    On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:

    >> Could you post a single comprehensive patch. I'm afraid I'm going to
    >> miss something...

    >
    > Ok. Which ones do you want?
    >
    > I'm guessing you want:
    >
    > All patches for Bug 131
    > Patch to add dirtycache flag
    > Patch to remove cached entries about uncached images upon rescan.
    >
    > and not:
    >
    > The patch which adds the wipecache functionality. (although I may as
    > well
    > include the code which adds the function to Info.pm and adds it to the
    > Command Line interface, just not the UI change).
    >
    > I submitted them indiviudally as I didn't know if you'd want to apply
    > them
    > all. I'm having fun with CVS now as my files are getting very out of
    > sync
    > . The original patches no longer apply cleanly...
    >
    > RP
    >
    >
    >
    >

  6. #6
    Richard Purdie
    Guest

    Re: Busy day, let's wrap it up

    > I'd like all of them to look at. As long as they don't break anything,
    > I'm not opposed to adding any of them, including the wipecache button.


    A complete patch is attached. None of it should break anything.

    RP

  7. #7
    Richard Purdie
    Guest

    Re: Busy day, let's wrap it up

    > > I'd like all of them to look at. As long as they don't break anything,
    > > I'm not opposed to adding any of them, including the wipecache button.

    >
    > A complete patch is attached. None of it should break anything.


    Nearly complete :-/. I missed out the strings.txt additions it needs. Patch
    attached.

    Sorry,

    RP

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •