Now only if they would release the recordings in FLAC format!
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: EMI Abandoning DRM
-
2007-04-04, 12:02 #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 252
EMI Abandoning DRM
-
2007-04-04, 13:27 #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 610
One serious iTunes peeve down (at least regarding EMI music), several pet ones remaining:
1) Theoretically, I don't mind lossy, as long as it's transparent and in my preferred format. The problem is the latter, which leads to transcoding, which in turn ruins the former. So I'd also like to see lossless (I'd prefer FLAC, but would settle for ALAC--as long as it's DRM-free).
2) I'd like to be able to buy songs that are only for sale through a foreign iTunes store even though I live in the US. You'd think that wouldn't be so hard. Sheesh!
3) I want a web interface. I hate having to install some thick client just to download music.
-
2007-04-04, 13:44 #3
They aren't quite abandoning DRM - the regular-priced tracks are still 128k and still have DRM. I don't see why they wouldn't strip the DRM from these also, as they are less likely to be traded than the 256k tracks which have no DRM.
And, they are charging a 30-cent premium for the DRM-free tracks. It's not clear whether this is because of the higher bitrate or because of no DRM. Probably both. I guess they want to see how it flies and if the tracks show up on P2P systems.
-
2007-04-04, 13:58 #4
EMI has also said they want to work with other online vendors (Rhapsody, Yahoo, Napster, Walmart, Emusic) and let vendors set their own price/quality balance. So maybe it would be $1.29/track for a 256kAAC at iTunes, but an upstart like Emusic could have a lower price or higher bitrate mp3 as a draw, while Walmart could just target the low end and do 128k but "This will play on your iPod and Zune!" push... and keep their price the same. Maybe some will offer "download the whole album as lossless, including cover art in 1200x1200 for $10!"
It sounds like a very good business move and should help the consumers as more vendors sign on and determine how they plan to deal with it.
-
2007-04-04, 17:51 #5
Anything that's better value for the consumer is a step in the right direction. Charging more for lossy, protected files than it costs for the actual CD was always a questionable strategy IMO.
-
2007-04-10, 03:01 #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 243
I recently tried to purchase Christina Sturmer's "Lebe Lauter" album from iTunes. It was available from iTunes Austria, but I couldn't buy it in the US. I ended up getting the the CD on Ebay from a record shop in Austria who shipped it to me in the US. The CD is not dead, yet!
EMI and others will have to:
1) Offer lossless.
2) Offer their entire catalog, not just selected titles.
before we are on the road to nailing the lid on CD's coffin.
-
2007-04-10, 03:15 #7Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 19
Just dropping DRM can't stop pirates. They need to actually give pirates a fight, no DRM, lossless, and don't raise the price!
Allofmp3 earned billions, and if the big legal record labels starts in the same direction as allofmp3, and raise the prices a little bit more than them, they would earn even more than they do now, or atleast earn the same, and not force the consumer to become criminals.
-
2007-04-10, 05:19 #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 252
-
2007-04-11, 15:33 #9Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 610

Reply With Quote

