Hi all,
I havn't yet purchased a SB2, but I'm tempted.
My mission is to reduce the "box count" as I call it in my living room. e.g. replace VHS and seperate DVD player with a DVD recorder. Replace big CD player with Squeezebox??
There seems to be a million and one ways to go, an SB2 being just one of them.
Audio quality is very high on my priorities, but I don't want to feed an external DAC as this would mean getting another box...something I'm trying to reduce.
Therefore, if I use the analogue outputs from the SB2, will I get disappointing sound quality when compared to my Copland £1000 CD player? I understand it's a little unfair, and I am willing to trade some quality for the convenience of putting all my CD's into storage....but not much.
I like all "mainstream" music and a sound that is detailed, but not harsh, not boomey in the bass and natural mid-range.
Don't want much, do I ????
Alternatively I could build my own music server and use a high quality sound card like M-Audio, Terratec etc etc. If built around mini-ITX or similar it will be near silent and fairly cheap.
Pre-made servers such as Imerge seem a rip-off. They want an extra £200 to upgrade from a useless 80Gb hard disk to a useful 250Gb.
Appreciate any thoughts and experiences. Thanks all.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
2005-04-19, 12:57 #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 5
SB 2 - audio quality through analogue outputs
-
2005-04-19, 13:34 #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Buckinghamshire, England
- Posts
- 9,983
Jdi
Tony,
In terms of digital output into a DAC, the SB2 will outperform a Copland CDA 822 (is that the one you have?) but don't trust me - trust your ears. I realise that a dem is going to be somewhat difficult...but the SB2 is NOT expensive. Take a punt and try it - if you still prefer the Copland, use the SB in another room as a second system or get a refund.
I can't (yet) speak for the analogue o/p of the SB2 vs. the Copland or anything else for that matter. However, your perfectly reasonable non-boomy bass and natural midrange requirements are unlikely to be achieved in any normal room/system (IMHO) without room correction technology, regardless of source/speakers. However, a nice top end (over say 4Khz) is definitely possible with the SB2.
As for wanting less boxes...Bose & B&O do some nice systems
You can always hide a DAC away somewhere - you don't need to physically access it (Mine is in a cupboard out of sight)...and some of them - even very very good ones - are very small...
-
2005-04-19, 14:50 #3Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 5
Thanks Phil. As you say, it's probably worth a punt. At worst I can ebay it if it doesn't work out.
My Copland is a 5 yr old CDA-266. I could probably get something better for half the price now, but for the time it was (and still is) a good player IMO).
Any DAC recommendations would be appreciated, be it new or second hand, although not silly money.
-
2005-04-20, 02:01 #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 9
If you want to save space you might like to try the following.
- Get the SB2
- a Chibi Saru Dac & PSU
- Sonic T digital amp
All that lot will cost less than your Copland and take up less room. IME the SB2 & DAC will comfortably match and even surpass CD players ten times it's price.
-
2005-04-20, 02:36 #5I thought I would add that if you're considering the Chibi Saru (from www.scottnixon.com), then you definitely need a good power supply. I've compared mine using a cheap 12VDC wall-wart, and it's significantly inferior to the SB2's internal DAC (with the SB2 using it's own cheap wall-wart). I'm in the process of building a better power supply, so we'll see how that elevates the Chibi Saru.
Originally Posted by Tom Alves
Regarding the elimination of boxes, you could rehouse the SB2, Chibi Saru, power supply(ies), and Sonic T in a single box, for an "all-in-one" solution.
-=> Mike Hanson <=-
-
2005-04-20, 14:53 #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 122
I am currently using the MSB "Nelson" Link III DAC. It's a step up from the SB2 analog outputs without upsampling, and upsampling results in a subtle improvement.
I am using the standard MSB "line lump" power supply, not their fancy $400 separate power supply. I've considered building my own power supply, but it really sounds good as-is.
Soon, my friend should have a Musical Fidelity A3.24 that I can compare against the MSB Nelson.

Reply With Quote
