Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,517

    Analog or digital?

    I have a Squeezebox 2, currently connected through the analog output to my pre-amp.

    But I recently bought a Novafidelity X40 (sometimes called Cocktail X40) until with multi inputs. I could put the Squeezebox through its digital inputs, in which case it would go via the X40's DAC, which is a ES9018K2M Sabre│▓ Reference DAC.

    Which would people recommend? That is, I suppose, is the X40 DAC better than the DAC built in to the SB?

    And if I do use the digital out from the SB, which method of connection tends to be preferable?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Watford, UK
    Posts
    1,846
    The answer to this question is always the same. Try it both ways and pick which ever you prefer. Don't let anyone else tell you what is best. Don't worry about what might be the theoretically superior arrangement. Only you are entitled to say what's best for you.
    Transporter -> ATC SCM100A

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,002
    While I agree with the above, I'd also say the x40 will produce a technically superior result.


    Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk
    --
    Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0
    Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k albums..

  4. #4
    Senior Member iPhone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,213
    .
    .
    The OWNER'S Ear always rules, BUT the DAC in your newer unit is OBVIOUSLY superior to an SB2 no matter what your Ear/Brain union tells you. Also remember that you are VERY used to listening to the SB2 analog setup.

    The real question here is whether it is time to replace the SB2 with a better unit IE a better higher resolution music streamer. If one doesn't need access to high resolution decoding, the quickest update is using the newer DAC getting away from the older SB2 analog section.
    iPhone
    Media Room:
    ModWright Platinum Signature Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, Vandersteen Speakers: Quatro Wood Mains, VCC-5 Reference Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Video: Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1, Vandersteen V2W Subwoofer

    Living Room:
    Transporter, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1

    Office: Touch with Vandersteen VSM-1s
    Kitchen: Touch in-wall mount w/ Thiel Powerpoint 1.2s
    Bedroom: Squeezebox BOOM
    Bathroom: Squeezebox Radio
    Around the House: SliMP3, SB1, SB2, SB3
    Ford Thunderbird: SB Touch, USB drive
    Ford Expedition: SB Touch, USB drive

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,517
    Thanks. I thought it very likely that the X40 DAC was superior, but did not know for certain, that's why I asked.

    Any views about the two ways of making a digital connection, are there advantages and disadvantages, or are they both much the same.

    I do understand that listening is the best way to decide (particularly as I am old enough that my hearing has issues, and also there is the matter of what music I listen to). And of course, I could buy both types of connectors and see, but that would be rather a waste of money.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Watford, UK
    Posts
    1,846
    Quote Originally Posted by danco View Post
    Any views about the two ways of making a digital connection, are there advantages and disadvantages, or are they both much the same.
    In practice all digital connections are much the same. In theory an optical one will avoid any possible ground loop.

    One final thing. Pretty much all competent DACs are very close, so any difference between the SB2 and X40 will be marginal. So when you compare them make sure you level match, otherwise whichever is slightly louder will sound better and the result will be meaningless.
    Transporter -> ATC SCM100A

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    1
    I was using X40 and it was way better than standard built in.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Julf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,451
    Quote Originally Posted by Fermon View Post
    I was using X40 and it was way better than standard built in.
    How did you do the level matching?
    "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •