Home of the Squeezebox™ & Transporter® network music players.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Senior Member Wombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Archimago View Post
    Good job testing. I wish the old shills writing in audiophile magazines would try something like this out and be honest about it.
    Writing about the sound of Hi$res on the net is not easy.
    At CA someone took your finding that you can't hear a difference between a 24/96 and MQA as proof how good MQA is and indeed higher resolution worth the effort
    Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers

  2. #12
    Senior Member Archimago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,085
    Quote Originally Posted by Wombat View Post
    Writing about the sound of Hi$res on the net is not easy.
    At CA someone took your finding that you can't hear a difference between a 24/96 and MQA as proof how good MQA is and indeed higher resolution worth the effort


    Well, it's all a matter of perspective, right? Sure, MQA does fill in the frequency gaps objectively. "Worth it" gets us back to subjective adjudication and whether the person bothered to A/B the "difference".
    Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective' audiophile blog.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •