View Full Version : newbie TS-101 questions
All being well, I should take delivery of the above tomorrow.
The SB3 is another story. Ripcaster were out of black wifi's, so ordered from ebuyer, accidently put wrong card date in, wouldn't let me change payment, cancelled and ordered again, now subject to security check "which could hold your order up by 48-72 hours" Arrgh !!!
Anyway, back to the TS-101.
Am I better ripping my CD's directly to it's disk, or my desktop's disk and then transfer to the TS-101 ?
Peter
roamingstudio
2006-11-07, 14:12
The TS101 is a nice device but by default does not have slimserver installed. Paul at Progressive (UK) (www.progressiveav.com) provide an update - in the UK via a voucher... or it could also be that it was installed before your purchase. You can also do other things with the TS101 - there is a nice wiki we are developing at http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Open_Turbostation:TS101
Enjoy
The TS101 is a nice device but by default does not have slimserver installed. Paul at Progressive (UK) (www.progressiveav.com) provide an update - in the UK via a voucher... or it could also be that it was installed before your purchase. You can also do other things with the TS101 - there is a nice wiki we are developing at http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Qnap_Turbostation:TS101
Enjoy
Thanks, it is a Progressive 101 via Ripcaster so it should have SS installed.
Peter
Anyway, back to the TS-101.
Am I better ripping my CD's directly to it's disk, or my desktop's disk and then transfer to the TS-101 ?
Depends on what format you will be ripping to, and whether it will be re-encoded to another format.
For example ripping a CD straight to MP3 could be done to the TS-101 disk.
But ripping to WMV and then re-encoding to FLAC would have to be done on the desktop. The TS-101 can't run the re-encoding program.
Personally I always rip to desktop (in FLAC), then make sure all names & tags are correct and then copy across
That'll do for me :-)
I want to use FLAC anyway, though I was surprised (especially in the "Audiophile" forum) given the hifi quality of the SB3 nobody is using .wav ?
Peter
There should be no advantage in using .wav over FLAC. FLAC files contain every bit of information contained in the original .wav.
There should be no advantage in using .wav over FLAC. FLAC files contain every bit of information contained in the original .wav.
Thanks for the info Fifer
Peter
peterbell
2006-11-08, 13:30
I rip directly to the TS101. The conversion Wav->FLAC all happens perfectly happily on the TS101 disk. However, it is a little slower than performing the rip to a local disk.
I rip directly to the TS101. The conversion Wav->FLAC all happens perfectly happily on the TS101 disk. However, it is a little slower than performing the rip to a local disk.
As I am connected to the router via wifi, I'll probably go the desktop first route.
Peter
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.